Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317308›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2020

Adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making score. Part 2: development and validation of a scoring system to guide the selection of treatment modalities for patients above 40 years with adult spinal deformity.

Takashi Fujishiro, Louis Boissière, Derek Thomas Cawley, Daniel Larrieu, Olivier Gille, Jean-Marc Vital, Ferran Pellisé, Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-Grueso, Frank Kleinstück, Emre Acaroglu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of radiologic variables on item responses of ODI, SRS22 and SF-36. in adult spinal deformity patients: differential item functioning (DIF) analysis results from a multi-center database.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Corrective Surgery on Health-Related Quality of Life Subclasses in Adult Scoliosis: Will Degree of Correction Prognosticate Degree of Improvement?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takashi FujishiroDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan. ort167@osaka-med.ac.jp.
Louis BoissièreL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Derek Thomas CawleyL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Daniel LarrieuL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Olivier GilleL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Marc VitalL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Ferran PelliséSpine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Val Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco Javier Sanchez Pérez-GruesoSpine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Frank KleinstückSpine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Emre AcarogluAnkara Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Ahmet AlanaySpine Surgery Unit, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim ObeidL'Institut de la Colonne Vertébrale, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
European Spine Study Group, ESSG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to develop and internally validate a scoring system, the adult spinal deformity surgical decision-making (ASD-SDM) score, to guide the decision-making process for ASD patients aged above 40 years.

methodsA multicentre prospective ASD database was retrospectively reviewed. The scoring system was developed using data from a derivation set and was internally validated in a validation set. The performance of the ASD-SDM score for predicting surgical management was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsA total of 702 patients were included for analysis in the present study. The scoring system developed based on 562 patients, ranging from 0 to 12 points, included five parameters: leg pain scored by the numerical rating scale; pain and self-image domains in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 score; coronal Cobb angle; and relative spinopelvic alignment. Surgical indication was graded as low (score 0 to 4), moderate (score 5 to 7), and high (score 8 to 12) groups. In the validation set of 140 patients, the AUC for predicting surgical management according to the ASD-SDM score was 0.797 (standard error = 0.037, P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.714 to 0.861), and in the low, moderate, and high surgical indication groups, 23.7%, 43.5%, and 80.4% of the patients, respectively, were treated surgically.

conclusionsThe ASD-SDM score demonstrated reliability, with higher scores indicating a higher probability of surgery. This index could aid in the selection of surgery for ASD patients in clinical settings. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesSpinal CurvaturesAdultClinical Decision-MakingHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAdult scoliosisAdult spinal deformityDecision-making processScoring systemSurgical indicationSurgical management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.