Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317305›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2019

Network Connectivity, Centrality and Fragmentation in the Greek-Key Protein Topology.

Zeinab Haratipour, Hind Aldabagh, Yaohang Li, Lesley H Greene

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeinab HaratipourDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.
Hind AldabaghDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.
Yaohang LiDepartment of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.
Lesley H GreeneDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA. lgreene@odu.edu.
Old Dominion University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and computationally predicting the protein folding process remains one of the most challenging scientific problems and has uniquely garnered the interdisciplinary efforts of researchers from both the biological, chemical, physical and computational disciplines. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of long-range interactions in guiding the native structure. However, predicting how the native long-range interaction network forms to generate a specific topology from among all other conformations remains unresolved. The present research study conducts an exploratory study to identify amino acids and long-range interactions that have the potential to play a key role in building and maintaining the protein topology. Towards this end, the application of network science is utilized and developed to analyze the structures of a group of proteins that share a common Greek-key topology but differ in sequence, secondary structure and function. We investigate the idea that the residues with high betweeness centrality score are potentially significant in maintaining the protein network and in governing the Greek-key topology. This hypothesis is tested by two different computational methods: through a fragmentation test and by the analysis of diameter impacts. In summary, we find a subset of selected residues in similar geographical positions in all model proteins, which demonstrates the role of these specific residues and regions in governing the Greek-key topology from a network perspective.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsProteinsBetweeness centralityDiameterFragmentationGreek-key topologyProtein networks

Identifiers

PMID31317305
OpenAlexW2959030088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.