Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317216›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

UK medical students' perspectives on practical prescribing teaching and learning provisions: a cross-sectional survey.

M B Kennedy, S E Williams, I Haq, M Okorie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M B KennedyDepartment of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
S E WilliamsSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
I HaqSydney Medical Programme, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
M OkorieDepartment of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. m.okorie@bsms.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1960-8860

Funding

Brighton and Sussex Medical School xxxx
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine medical students' perspectives on the provision for the teaching and learning of processes that lead to and include the writing of a clear, safe and legal prescription (practical prescribing) in UK medical schools.

methodsWe designed a cross-sectional survey of UK medical students in years three, four and five. Students were asked about their experiences and views of practical prescribing teaching and learning they had encountered on their medical course.

resultsA total of 1023 medical students responded (7% response rate), from 25 UK medical schools: 22%, 37% and 41% in the third, fourth and final years, respectively. Teaching of practical prescribing was widespread, with 94.3% of final year (n = 396, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 92-97%), 86.8% of fourth year (n = 328, CI = 83-90%) and 73.8% of third year (n = 166, CI = 67-80%) students reporting they had received it. Availability of this teaching appeared to vary by medical school. Self-directed learning was the most frequently reported mode of delivery (90.9%, n = 809). Validated pre-prescribing and simulation were perceived by students in each year group as the most effective methods. Clinical pharmacologists, clinical pharmacists and junior doctors were perceived by the students as being the most effective professional groups at teaching practical prescribing.

conclusionsUK medical students reported a variety of methods utilised in the teaching and learning of practical prescribing. However, methods they perceived to be very effective (simulation and pre-prescribing) do not appear to be widely available or are only reserved for the final year of study. Combining such methods with involvement of professional groups perceived to be most effective should be explored.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEducation, PharmacyStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceHumansPharmacology, ClinicalPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomMedical educationMedical studentsPharmacologyPrescribing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.