Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317134›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Successful treatment of large cavity esophageal disruptions with transluminal washout and endoscopic vacuum therapy: a report of two cases.

Leonard T Walsh, Justin Loloi, Carl E Manzo, Abraham Mathew, Jennifer Maranki, Charles E Dye, John M Levenick, Matthew D Taylor, Matthew T Moyer

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonard T WalshDepartment of Internal Medicine, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, 500 University Drive, HU33, UPC 4100 Hershey, 17033, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-2393
Justin LoloiPenn State Hershey College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Carl E ManzoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Abraham MathewDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Jennifer MarankiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Charles E DyeDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
John M LevenickDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-4650
Matthew D TaylorDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
Matthew T MoyerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute, high-grade esophageal perforation and postoperative leak after esophagogastrostomy are associated with high morbidity and mortality due to the development of mediastinitis and thoracic contamination. Endoscopic vacuum therapy has proven to be a feasible, safe therapy for management of esophageal wall defects, but with limited success. We describe a retrospective single-center analysis of two patients who underwent endoscopic vacuum therapy for significant esophageal disruptions with a median cross-sectional diameter of 10.7 cm. The technique involved the use of a standard upper video endoscope, nasogastric tube, and vacuum-assisted closure dressing kit, with endoscopic placement of a polyurethane sponge and nasogastric tube assembly into the mediastinal or thoracic cavity. Serial washout and debridement were performed prior to each sponge insertion. Data were collected on indication, size of the cavities, time to intervention, number of procedures, time to resolution, outcomes, and adverse events. Two patients underwent therapy with a mean age of 69.5. The median size of the collections via longest cross-sectional diameter was 10.7 cm. The average number of endoscopic vacuum therapy performed was six and average duration of therapy was 49 days. Complete resolution was achieved in both patients. One patient died 6 weeks later due to severe sepsis from aspiration pneumonia. Endoscopic washout and debridement followed by endoscopic vacuum therapy can be effective for large, even multiple, thoracic and mediastinal contaminations following esophageal perforation and gastroesopagheal anastomotic dehiscence and leaks in appropriately selected patients.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakendoscopic vacuum therapyesophageal disruptionesophageal perforation

Identifiers

PMID31317134
PMCPMC6620722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.