Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317125›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Evaluation effectiveness of 0.1% nepafenac on injection-related pain in patients undergoing intravitreal Ozurdex injection.

Tevfik Ogurel, Reyhan Ogurel, Fatma Ozkal, Yaşar Ölmez, Nurgül Örnek, Zafer Onaran

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tevfik OgurelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Yahsihan, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2286
Reyhan OgurelReyhan Ogurel Eye Clinic, Kırıkkale, Turkey.
Fatma OzkalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Yahsihan, Turkey.
Yaşar ÖlmezAdıyaman Besni State Hospital, Besni, Turkey.
Nurgül ÖrnekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Yahsihan, Turkey.
Zafer OnaranDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Kırıkkale University, Yahsihan, Turkey.
Kırıkkale University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the analgesic effect of topical 0.1% nepafenac solution during intravitreal Ozurdex injection.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study included 59 patients who were diagnosed with retinal vein occlusion or pseudophakic cystoid macular edema and were selected to receive intravitreal Ozurdex injection. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1, consisting of 31 eyes of 31 patients, received topical 0.1% nepafenac with topical anesthesia (0.5% proparacaine HCl, Alcaine; Alcon, TX, USA), and group 2, consisting of 28 eyes of 28 patients, received placebo with topical anesthesia.

resultsThere were 14 (45.2%) men and 17 (54.8%) women in group 1 and 16 (57.1%) men and 12 (42.9%) women in group 2. The mean age of the subjects was 64.42 ± 5.51 years in group 1 and 62.32 ± 7.54 years in group 2. The median visual analog scale pain score was 2 (1-3) in group 1 and 4 (1-6) in group 2. The visual analog scale pain score was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (

conclusionTopical 0.1% nepafenac has an additive analgesic effect when combined with topical anesthesia for intravitreal Ozurdex injection.

Indexed as

intravitreal injectionnepafenacOzurdexpain

Identifiers

PMID31317125
PMCPMC6620721
OpenAlexW2959990242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.