Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31317089›Full record

ReviewJournal of current ophthalmology2019

Intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus; A review of literature.

Leila Ghiasian, Navid Abolfathzadeh, Navid Manafi, Ali Hadavandkhani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of current ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hypermature Intumescent Cataract in Advanced Keratoglobus.International medical case reports journal · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Update on Intraocular Lens Formulas and Calculations.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila GhiasianEye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Navid AbolfathzadehNikookari Eye Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Navid ManafiEye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali HadavandkhaniEye Research Center, Rassoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the published literature regarding cataract surgery in keratoconus (KCN) patients with emphasis on challenges encountered during intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation and their solutions.

methodsA literature review was performed to investigate all the relevant articles on the advancements of IOL calculations in KCN patients.

resultsCataract surgery in keratoconic eyes can improve patients' refraction, and proper patient selection and IOL calculation methods are necessary to get the best results. The main problem in KCN patients is unreliable biometric measurements. It is more difficult to make conclusions in more advanced keratoconic corneas, as the steep keratometric values in these eyes will result in the selection of a low-power IOL. Presence of a low-power IOL will yield in extreme postoperative hyperopia, and IOL exchange might be mandatory. In cases in which keratoplasty may be needed in the future, contact lens fitting can help surgeons make a better decision preoperatively. Axial length (AL) measurements may have better repeatability and reproducibility than keratometry (K) readings in keratoconic eyes. SRK II formula may provide the most accurate IOL power in mild KCN. There is still not a comprehensive consensus of which formula is the best one in moderate and severe KCN, as the literature is limited in this subject.

conclusionsVarious methods of IOL power calculation optimization and recommendations may hold the key to improve surgical outcomes in keratoconic eyes. There are multiple sources of biometric error in KCN patients, hence IOL calculation methods may not be as efficient as expected in these eyes.

Indexed as

CataractCorneal ectasiaIntraocular lens powerKeratoconicKeratoconus

Identifiers

PMID31317089
PMCPMC6611933
OpenAlexW2922379753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.