ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2019
Elastosonographic evaluation of the post-operative morpho-volumetric recovery of the gonad in the cryptorchid patient.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Mitochondrial Dynamics as Potential Modulators of Hormonal Therapy Effectiveness in Males.Biology · 2023Review
- A new frontier in therapy personalisation based on in vitro studies to preserve fertility potential of men.Andrologia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCryptorchidism is associated with alteration of fertility potential. The aim of this study is to evaluate mid/long-term morphology and volume of the operated testis for undescended testes by using elastosonography. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe medical records of consecutive patients who had received orchiopexy at the Authors' Institution between January 2014 and January 2017 were retrospectively considered. The patients enrolled in the study were divided into different groups depending on their age at the time of the procedure and on the time elapsed from it. The radiological and surgical examinations examined position, volume and trophism of both testes.
resultsDuring the study period 270 patients received surgery; only 34 patients complied with the inclusion criteria: 19 with right orchiopexy and 15 with left orchiopexy (P > 0.05) (P = 0.57). The mean testicular volume of the operated testis was 0.59 ± 0.32 ml, while the mean testicular volume of non-operated testis was 0.88 ± 0.34 ml (P < 0.05). The elastosonographic comparison between operated and non-operated testis showed that the operated testis had a higher elastosonographic result (grade 2-3) (P < 0.05). Higher grades at elastosonography corresponded to smaller testicular volume.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the patient's age at surgery is correlated with significative differences in terms of volume and elasticity (testicular quality). The study also shows that there is not a progressive improvement of elasticity at follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31317058PMC6627549W2987139389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.