Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316814›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2019

Radiation damage in small-molecule crystallography: fact not fiction.

Jeppe Christensen, Peter N Horton, Charles S Bury, Joshua L Dickerson, Helena Taberman, Elspeth F Garman, Simon J Coles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Powder diffraction data beyond the pattern: a practical review.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Radiation damage as a source of information.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024
    Article
  8. Lattice response to the radiation damage of molecular crystals: radiation-induced versus thermal expansivity.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024
    Article
  9. Incommensurate structures and radiation damage in RbActa crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2023
    Article
  10. MicroED in drug discovery.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Variability in X-ray induced effects in [Rh(COD)Cl]Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The benefits of CuIUCrJ · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeppe ChristensenDiamond Light Source Ltd, Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-8307
Peter N HortonNational Crystallography Service, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-2016
Charles S BuryDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Joshua L DickersonDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Helena TabermanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Elspeth F GarmanDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-5665
Simon J ColesNational Crystallography Service, School of Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8414-9272

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally small-molecule crystallographers have not usually observed or recognized significant radiation damage to their samples during diffraction experiments. However, the increased flux densities provided by third-generation synchrotrons have resulted in increasing numbers of observations of this phenomenon. The diversity of types of small-molecule systems means it is not yet possible to propose a general mechanism for their radiation-induced sample decay, however characterization of the effects will permit attempts to understand and mitigate it. Here, systematic experiments are reported on the effects that sample temperature and beam attenuation have on radiation damage progression, allowing qualitative and quantitative assessment of their impact on crystals of a small-molecule test sample. To allow inter-comparison of different measurements, radiation-damage metrics (diffraction-intensity decline, resolution fall-off, scaling

Indexed as

doseglobal damageradiation damagesmall-molecule crystallographyspecific damage

Identifiers

PMID31316814
PMCPMC6608633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.