Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316769›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2019

Traumatic esophageal perforation in Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital: A case-series.

Jan C Vázquez-Rodríguez, Natalia M Pelet Del Toro, Omar García-Rodríguez, Ediel Ramos-Meléndez, Julio López-Maldonado, Felipe Rodríguez, Jorge Pelet Mejías, Pablo Rodríguez-Ortiz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-iatrogenic esophageal trauma: a narrative review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan C Vázquez-RodríguezPonce Health Sciences University, School of Medicine, Ponce, Puerto Rico.
Natalia M Pelet Del ToroUniversity of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Omar García-RodríguezDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Ediel Ramos-MeléndezDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Julio López-MaldonadoDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Felipe RodríguezDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Jorge Pelet MejíasDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Pablo Rodríguez-OrtizDivision of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
University of Puerto Rico System · PRPonce Health Sciences University · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal injuries are rare, life-threatening, events with an overall reported incidence of less than 3%. In rare cases, trauma due to blunt or penetrating injuries cause esophageal perforations, which account for less than 15% of all esophageal injuries. MATERIALS AND

methodsA case-series study was conducted to describe the outcomes and management of all the traumatic esophageal injuries at the Puerto Rico Trauma Hospital (PRTH) from 2000 through 2017. These cases were evaluated in terms of etiology of perforation, mechanism of injury and esophageal level.

resultsSixteen patients were treated for esophageal injuries at the PRTH between 2000 and 2017. Of these patients, 15 (93.7%) were males with a median age of 24.5 years (16, 49). Regarding the etiology of the esophageal perforation, 2 (12.5%) patients suffered blunt esophageal trauma, and 14 (87.5%) patients had penetrating trauma to the esophagus. The most common mechanism of perforation was gunshot wound 10 (62.4%), followed by stab wound 4 (25.0%), and the least common were motor vehicle collision 1 (6.3%) and pedestrian injured by traffic 1 (6.3%). Regarding esophageal location, 9 (56.3%) patients presented cervical, 6 (37.5%) thoracic, and 1 (6.3%) abdominal injuries. Most patients 13 (81.3%) had a prompt diagnosis of traumatic esophageal perforation, while 3 (18.7%) patients had a delayed diagnosis. Only 2 (12.5%) deaths occurred among our 16 patients, including 1 (6.3%) in delayed diagnosed subjects.

conclusionEsophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition and should be treated urgently. An early diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment completed in the first 24-h is fundamental for a good outcome.

Indexed as

Blunt esophageal perforationEsophageal injury/perforationEsophagusGunshot esophageal perforationTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31316769
PMCPMC6611994
OpenAlexW2956014594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.