ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019
DNA nanostructures: A versatile lab-bench for interrogating biological reactions.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piggybacking functionalized DNA nanostructures into live-cell nuclei.Science advances · 2024Article
- Piggybacking functionalized DNA nanostructures into live cell nuclei.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Sequence-selective purification of biological RNAs using DNA nanoswitches.Cell reports methods · 2021Article
- Magnesium-Free Immobilization of DNA Origami Nanostructures at Mica Surfaces for Atomic Force Microscopy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- DNA Origami as Emerging Technology for the Engineering of Fluorescent and Plasmonic-Based Biosensors.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A molecular device: A DNA molecular lock driven by the nicking enzymes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
- Manipulating Enzymes Properties with DNA Nanostructures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At its inception DNA nanotechnology was conceived as a tool for spatially arranging biological molecules in a programmable and deterministic way to improve their interrogation. To date, DNA nanotechnology has provided a versatile toolset of nanostructures and functional devices to augment traditional single molecule investigation approaches - including atomic force microscopy - by isolating, arranging and contextualising biological systems at the single molecule level. This review explores the state-of-the-art of DNA-based nanoscale tools employed to enhance and tune the interrogation of biological reactions, the study of spatially distributed pathways, the visualisation of enzyme interactions, the application and detection of forces to biological systems, and biosensing platforms.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.