Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316357›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2019

Can Brain Waves Really Tell If a Product Will Be Purchased? Inferring Consumer Preferences From Single-Item Brain Potentials.

Nobuhiko Goto, Xue Li Lim, Dexter Shee, Aya Hatano, Kok Wei Khong, Luciano Grüdtner Buratto, Motoki Watabe, Alexandre Schaefer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nobuhiko GotoDepartment of Psychology, Kyoto Notre Dame University, Kyoto, Japan.
Xue Li LimSchool of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Dexter SheeDepartment of Psychology, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Aya HatanoKochi University of Technology, Kami, Japan.
Kok Wei KhongSchool of Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, Taylor's University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
Luciano Grüdtner BurattoInstitute of Psychology, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Motoki WatabeSchool of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.
Alexandre SchaeferDepartment of Psychology, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has shown that event-related brain potentials (ERPs) recorded while participants view lists of different consumer goods can be modulated by their preferences toward these products. However, it remains largely unknown whether ERP activity specific to a single consumer item can be informative about whether or not this item will be preferred in a shopping context. In this study, we examined whether single-item ERPs could reliably predict consumer preferences toward specific consumer goods. We recorded scalp EEG from 40 participants while they were viewing pictures of consumer goods and we subsequently asked them to indicate their preferences for each of these items. Replicating previous results, we found that ERP activity averaged over the six most preferred products was significantly differentiated from ERP activity averaged across the six least preferred products for three ERP components: The N200, the late positive potential (LPP) and positive slow waves (PSW). We also found that using single-item ERPs to infer behavioral preferences about specific consumer goods led to an overall predictive accuracy of 71%, although this figure varied according to which ERPs were targeted. Later positivities such as the LPP and PSW yielded relatively higher predictive accuracy rates than the frontal N200. Our results suggest that ERPs related to single consumer items can be relatively accurate predictors of behavioral preferences depending on which type of ERP effects are chosen by the researcher, and ultimately on the level of prediction errors that users choose to tolerate.

Indexed as

attentionconsumer behaviordecision-makingEEGevent-related potentialsmotivational relevanceneuromarketingpreferences

Identifiers

PMID31316357
PMCPMC6611214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.