Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316355›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2019

The Median Nerve Injury Model in Pre-clinical Research - A Critical Review on Benefits and Limitations.

Giulia Ronchi, Michela Morano, Federica Fregnan, Pierfrancesco Pugliese, Alessandro Crosio, Pierluigi Tos, Stefano Geuna, Kirsten Haastert-Talini, Giovanna Gambarotta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Current neuropharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giulia RonchiDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Michela MoranoDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Federica FregnanDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Pierfrancesco PuglieseDipartimento di Chirurgia Generale e Specialistica, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Ancona, Italy.
Alessandro CrosioUO Microchirurgia e Chirurgia della Mano, Ospedale Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.
Pierluigi TosUO Microchirurgia e Chirurgia della Mano, Ospedale Gaetano Pini, Milan, Italy.
Stefano GeunaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Kirsten Haastert-TaliniInstitute of Neuroanatomy and Cell Biology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Giovanna GambarottaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful introduction of innovative treatment strategies into clinical practise strongly depends on the availability of effective experimental models and their reliable pre-clinical assessment. Considering pre-clinical research for peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction, the far most used nerve regeneration model in the last decades is the sciatic nerve injury and repair model. More recently, the use of the median nerve injury and repair model has gained increasing attention due to some significant advantages it provides compared to sciatic nerve injury. Outstanding advantages are the availability of reliable behavioural tests for assessing posttraumatic voluntary motor recovery and a much lower impact on the animal wellbeing. In this article, the potential application of the median nerve injury and repair model in pre-clinical research is reviewed. In addition, we provide a synthetic overview of a variety of methods that can be applied in this model for nerve regeneration assessment. This article is aimed at helping researchers in adequately adopting this

Indexed as

animal experimental modelinjurymedian nerveregenerationrepairtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31316355
PMCPMC6609919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.