ReviewCurrent urology2019
Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Seminal Vesicle Stones.
Review in Current urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transurethral Treatment of a Seminal Vesicle Cyst With Lithiasis: Case Report.Case reports in surgery · 2025Article
- Construction of a clinically significant prostate cancer risk prediction model based on traditional diagnostic methods.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Seminal Vesicle Calculi as a Cause of Hematospermia and Ejaculatory Pain: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Unusual presentation of seminal vesicle abscess: a report of two cases.The Pan African medical journal · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasound as the preferred method for diagnosing intractable haematospermia.Andrologia · 2021Article
- Incidental findings in and around the prostate on prostate MRI: a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Successful treatment of seminal vesicle calculi and prostatic utricle calculi by transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy.Andrologia · 2020Article
- Efficacy and feasibility of day surgery using transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy under caudal block anesthesia for intractable hemospermia.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Article
- Rectoseminal vesicle fistula after radical surgery for rectal cancer: Four case reports and a literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Painful Ejaculation - An Ignored Symptom.Cureus · 2020Review
- Seminal Vesicle Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Article
- Validation of the Rat Model of Prostate Cancer: Correlating Seminal Vesicle Lesions With Dorsolateral Prostate Lesions.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsSeminal vesicle (SV) stones are a rare, and thus readily misdiagnosed condition in practice. Understanding the etiology, diagnosis, and management are crucial to guide a urologist's care, and are provided in this literature review.
methodsThe inclusion criteria for the literature search, using the search engines MEDLINE® and PubMed was conducted using a combined query of "seminal vesicle stone" and the following keywords: calculi, hematospermia, calcification, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).
resultsThe etiology of SV stones is currently unknown where majority of the patients present with having painful ejaculation and hematospermia. However, clinicians have reported potential etiologies by categorization as an inflammatory or non-in-flammatory. A majority of the previous cases had shown multiple stones being present in the SV duct system that are typically diagnosed through radiological examination such as TRUS, MRI, or plain radiographs. Amongst the many imaging approaches, TRUS remains the primary imaging diagnoses of SV calculi. Transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy has shown to be used in an abundant of the case reports to be an ideal surgical approach for managing small SV stones. In regard to larger stones, a transperitoneal laparoscopic protocol is proper.
conclusionThe current imaging techniques have increased the case reports and diagnosis of SV calculi; however, more research is warranted for understanding the pathogenesis of the formation of SV stones. An optimal management of the extraction of SV stones depends on a number of factors such as size and location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.