Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316318›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology2019

Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Seminal Vesicle Stones.

Saher Zaidi, Jason Gandhi, Omar Seyam, Gunjan Joshi, Wayne C Waltzer, Noel L Smith, Sardar Ali Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Seminal Vesicle Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Saher ZaidiDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Jason GandhiDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Omar SeyamDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Gunjan JoshiMedical Student Research Institute, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies.
Wayne C WaltzerFoley Plaza Medical, New York, NY, USA.
Noel L SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Stony Brook Southampton Hospital, Southampton, NY, USA.
Sardar Ali KhanDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Stony Brook University · USFoley Hoag (United States) · USSouthampton Hospital · USSt. George's University · GD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsSeminal vesicle (SV) stones are a rare, and thus readily misdiagnosed condition in practice. Understanding the etiology, diagnosis, and management are crucial to guide a urologist's care, and are provided in this literature review.

methodsThe inclusion criteria for the literature search, using the search engines MEDLINE® and PubMed was conducted using a combined query of "seminal vesicle stone" and the following keywords: calculi, hematospermia, calcification, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).

resultsThe etiology of SV stones is currently unknown where majority of the patients present with having painful ejaculation and hematospermia. However, clinicians have reported potential etiologies by categorization as an inflammatory or non-in-flammatory. A majority of the previous cases had shown multiple stones being present in the SV duct system that are typically diagnosed through radiological examination such as TRUS, MRI, or plain radiographs. Amongst the many imaging approaches, TRUS remains the primary imaging diagnoses of SV calculi. Transurethral seminal vesiculoscopy has shown to be used in an abundant of the case reports to be an ideal surgical approach for managing small SV stones. In regard to larger stones, a transperitoneal laparoscopic protocol is proper.

conclusionThe current imaging techniques have increased the case reports and diagnosis of SV calculi; however, more research is warranted for understanding the pathogenesis of the formation of SV stones. An optimal management of the extraction of SV stones depends on a number of factors such as size and location.

Indexed as

HematospermiaSeminal vesicle calculiSeminal vesicle stoneTransrectal ultrasoundTransurethral seminal vesiculoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31316318
PMCPMC6613319
OpenAlexW2944207047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.