ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
Radiation protection and standardization.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiation Safety Knowledge, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Practices Among Healthcare Workers in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid Phy-X/PSD-Geant4 Assessment of Gamma and Neutron Shielding in Lead-Free HDPE Composites Reinforced with High-Z Oxides.Polymers · 2026Article
- A multimethod assessment of the vascular surgery program director experience in creating effective training environments.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Radiation in the Orthopedic Operating Room: What We Know, What We Do, and What Needs Attention.Cureus · 2025Review
- Managing Radiation Exposure to Endourologists during Pregnancy.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Principles of radiation safety for anaesthetists.BJA education · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Assessing Knowledge of Radiation Protection and Safety Among Undergraduate and Intern Radiologic Technologists: A Pre- and Post-Educational Course Survey.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Establishing of a National Diagnostic Reference Level for Radiation Dose in Digital Paediatric Pelvic X-Rays in Jordan: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2025Article
- Radiation Protection in the Orthopedics Department: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Progress in Flexible and Wearable Lead-Free Polymer Composites for Radiation Protection.Polymers · 2024Review
- Compliance with radiation protection among radiographers in Eswatini public health facilities.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2024Article
- The effect of breast shielding outside the field of view on breast entrance surface dose in axial X-ray examinations: a phantom study.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Understanding the harm of low-dose computed tomography radiation to the body (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Medical Radiation Safety and COVID-19 Knowledge and Awareness among UAE Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ionization Radiation Shielding Effectiveness of Lead Acetate, Lead Nitrate, and Bismuth Nitrate-Doped Zinc Oxide Nanorods Thin Films: A Comparative Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Reduction of Radiation Exposure by Modifying Imaging Manner and Fluoroscopic Settings during Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2021Article
- Advances on marine-derived natural radioprotection compounds: historic development and future perspective.Marine life science & technology · 2021Review
- Radiation Protection Capability of Operating Room Personnel: Development and Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X - Rays has become integral and indispensable part of health care diagnosis and intervention. Intervention procedures in Orthopedics surgery now mostly performed under image intensifiers (C-Arm) which involve the risks of occupational overexposure of radiation to the patients and health care personnel. The principles of radiation protection are helpful in keeping radiation exposure just adequate for diagnostic and intervention procedures. Regular surveillance of protective apparel is necessary for longevity of safety. It is responsibility of all OT personnel to know and implement radiation safety. Each situation involving X-ray radiation should include justification of the procedure, minimum radiation exposure just adequate for diagnostic and interventional procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.