Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316185›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2020

Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions.

Armando Stabile, Francesco Giganti, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Samir S Taneja, Geert Villeirs, Inderbir S Gill, Clare Allen, Mark Emberton, Caroline M Moore, Veeru Kasivisvanathan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 227 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
227citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

227 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 374 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. AI-accelerated prostate MRI: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Incremental Impact of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2022
    Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

167 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Armando StabileDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. stabile.armando@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3700-0069
Francesco GigantiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431
Andrew B RosenkrantzDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Samir S TanejaDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Geert VilleirsDepartment of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Inderbir S GillUSC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Clare AllenDepartment of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark EmbertonDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4230-0338
Caroline M MooreDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Veeru KasivisvanathanDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNYU Langone Health · USGhent University Hospital · BEUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R014043/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could mitigate these diagnostic errors. The performance of mpMRI can vary depending on the population being studied, the execution of the MRI itself, the experience of the radiologist, whether additional biomarkers are considered and whether mpMRI-targeted biopsy is carried out alone or in addition to systematic biopsy. A number of challenges to implementation remain, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. Nevertheless, emerging clinical trial data support the adoption of this technology as part of the standard of care for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingDecision TreesForecastingHumansMaleProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31316185
OpenAlexW2956705941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.