Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31316124›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Application of Chaotic Laws to Improve Haplotype Assembly Using Chaos Game Representation.

Mohammad Hossein Olyaee, Alireza Khanteymoori, Khosrow Khalifeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Hossein OlyaeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Alireza KhanteymooriDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. khanteymoori@znu.ac.ir.
Khosrow KhalifehDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-0745
University of Zanjan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence data are deposited in the form of unphased genotypes and it is not possible to directly identify the location of a particular allele on a specific parental chromosome or haplotype. This study employed nonlinear time series modeling approaches to analyze the haplotype sequences obtained from the NGS sequencing method. To evaluate the chaotic behavior of haplotypes, we analyzed their whole sequences, as well as several subsequences from distinct haplotypes, in terms of the SNP distribution on their chromosomes. This analysis utilized chaos game representation (CGR) followed by the application of two different scaling methods. It was found that chaotic behavior clearly exists in most haplotype subsequences. For testing the applicability of the proposed model, the present research determined the alleles in gap positions and positions with low coverage by using chromosome subsequences in which 10% of each subsequence's alleles are replaced by gaps. After conversion of the subsequences' CGR into the coordinate series, a Local Projection (LP) method predicted the measure of ambiguous positions in the coordinate series. It was discovered that the average reconstruction rate for all input data is more than 97%, demonstrating that applying this knowledge can effectively improve the reconstruction rate of given haplotypes.

Indexed as

HaplotypesNonlinear DynamicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsAllelesChromosome MappingChromosomes, HumanComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicFractalsGenome, HumanHumans

Identifiers

PMID31316124
PMCPMC6637069
OpenAlexW2956606327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.