ArticleNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2019
Qualitative study of practices and challenges when making a diagnosis of asthma in primary care.
Article in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for recurrent attacks of wheeze in preschool children: a population-based cohort study in England.Archives of disease in childhood · 2025Article
- 'Will anybody listen?' Parents' views on childhood asthma care: a qualitative study.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Use and acceptability of an asthma diagnosis clinical decision support system for primary care clinicians: an observational mixed methods study.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Observational
- Article
- Gas cooking and respiratory outcomes in children: A systematic review.Global epidemiology · 2023Review
- Healthcare resources, organisational support and practice in asthma in six public health clinics in Malaysia.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2023Article
- Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Deriving and validating an asthma diagnosis prediction model for children and young people in primary care.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Qualitative study on perceptions of use of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) in asthma reviews.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2022Article
- Defining high probability when making a diagnosis of asthma in primary care: mixed-methods consensus workshop.BMJ open · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Misdiagnosis (over-diagnosis and under-diagnosis) of asthma is common. Under-diagnosis can lead to avoidable morbidity and mortality, while over-diagnosis exposes patients to unnecessary side effects of treatment(s) and results in unnecessary healthcare expenditure. We explored diagnostic approaches and challenges faced by general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses when making a diagnosis of asthma. Fifteen healthcare professionals (10 GPs and 5 nurses) of both sexes, different ages and varying years of experience who worked in NHS Lothian, Scotland were interviewed using in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach. Clinical judgement of the probability of asthma was fundamental in the diagnostic process. Participants used heuristic approaches to assess the clinical probability of asthma and then decide what tests to do, selecting peak expiratory flow measurements, spirometry and/or a trial of treatment as appropriate for each patient. Challenges in the diagnostic process included time pressures, the variable nature of asthma, overlapping clinical features of asthma with other conditions such as respiratory viral illnesses in children and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults. To improve diagnostic decision-making, participants suggested regular educational opportunities and better diagnostic tools. In the future, standardising the clinical assessment made by healthcare practitioners should be supported by improved access to diagnostic services for additional investigation(s) and clarification of diagnostic uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.