Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315912›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2019

An Environmental Scan of Biopsychosocial and Clinical Variables in Cohort Studies of Cancer Survivors.

Jessica L Krok-Schoen, Brittany M Bernardo, Joanne W Elena, Paige A Green, Elise Hoover, Juan Peng, Garnet L Anderson, Bette Caan, Lisa G Johnson, Electra D Paskett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The HealthStreet Cancer Survivor Cohort: a Community Registry for Cancer Research.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L Krok-SchoenDivision of Medical Dietetics and Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-5887
Brittany M BernardoComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Joanne W ElenaEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Paige A GreenBasic Biobehavioral and Psychological Science Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-7886-8924
Elise HooverEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
Juan PengCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Garnet L AndersonPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-5087-7837
Bette CaanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California.
Lisa G JohnsonPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Electra D PaskettComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. electra.paskett@osumc.edu.
Center for Cancer Research · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USOhio Department of Health · USThe Ohio State University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Women's Health Initiative Cancer Survivor CohortUM1CA173642 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ANDERSON, GARNET L., CAAN, BETTE J · 2013 to 2018
$12.1M
NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn inventory of cancer survivorship cohorts is necessary to identify important gaps in what is being studied among cancer survivors.

methodsWe conducted an environmental scan of cancer survivor cohorts to determine the scope and scale of information collected on demographic, biopsychosocial, and selected clinical variables from cancer survivors. Cohorts were eligible for inclusion in the environmental scan if the study was conducted in the United States, reported in English, and consisted of data collected from cancer survivors postdiagnosis and followed for at least 1 year.

resultsOut of the 131 cohorts identified, 62 were eligible. There were 23 cancer sites represented, and more than half of the studies included breast cancer survivors (

conclusionsExtensive data are available in cancer cohorts to study important questions relevant to cancer survivors. Cohorts should consider collecting information on social and environmental factors, as well as biospecimen collection and biomarker analyses, and should include survivors from cancer sites less likely to be studied. IMPACT: This information can assist researchers in understanding the types of information currently being gathered from cancer survivors for further analysis and identify areas where more research is needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCancer SurvivorsChildCohort StudiesComorbidityDemographyEnvironmentFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychologyQuality of LifeSocial Environment

Identifiers

PMID31315912
PMCPMC6774809
OpenAlexW2960385604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.