Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315908›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2019

Oral levosimendan in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase II multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Ammar Al-Chalabi, Pamela Shaw, P Nigel Leigh, Leonard van den Berg, Orla Hardiman, Albert Ludolph, Valtteri V Aho, Toni Sarapohja, Mikko Kuoppamäki

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Therapeutic targeting of ALS pathways: Refocusing an incomplete picture.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Levosimendan Efficacy and Safety: 20 Years of SIMDAX in Clinical Use.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Ammar Al-ChalabiDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, London, UK.
Pamela ShawSheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience and NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
P Nigel LeighDepartment of Neuroscience Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Trafford Centre for Biomedical Science, Falmer, Brighton, UK.
Leonard van den BergDepartmentof Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Orla HardimanAcademic Unit of Neurology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Albert LudolphDepartment of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Valtteri V AhoOrion Pharma, Orion Corporation, Turku, Finland valtteri.aho@orionpharma.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4937-6792
Toni SarapohjaOrion Pharma, Orion Corporation, Espoo, Finland.
Mikko KuoppamäkiOrion Pharma, Orion Corporation, Turku, Finland.
Orion Corporation (Finland) · FIBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBKing's College London · GBLundbeck (Denmark) · DKTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Sheffield · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L501529/1Medical Research Council MR/R024804/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral levosimendan in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). This phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, three-period study with 6 months open-label follow-up enrolled adults with ALS and sitting slow vital capacity (SVC) 60%-90 % of predicted from 11 sites in four countries.

methodsPatients received levosimendan 1 mg daily, 1 mg two times a day or placebo during three 14-day crossover periods and levosimendan 1-2 mg daily during open-label follow-up. Primary endpoint was sitting SVC; secondary endpoints included supine SVC, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), tolerability and safety.

resultsOf 66 patients randomised, 59 contributed to the double-blind results and 50 entered open-label follow-up. Sitting SVC was not significantly different between the treatments. In post hoc analysis using period-wise baselines, supine SVC favoured levosimendan over placebo, estimated mean differences from baseline being -3.62% on placebo, +0.77% on levosimendan 1 mg daily (p=0.018) and +2.38% on 1 mg two times a day (p=0.001). Headache occurred in 16.7% of patients during levosimendan 1 mg daily (p=0.030), 28.6% during 1 mg two times a day (p=0.002) and 3.3% during placebo. The respective frequencies for increased heart rate were 5.1% (p=0.337), 18.5% (p=0.018) and 1.7%. No significant differences between the treatments were seen for other adverse events.

conclusionsLevosimendan did not achieve the primary endpoint of improving sitting SVC in ALS. Headache and increased heart rate were increased on levosimendan, although it was otherwise well tolerated. A phase III study to evaluate the longer term effects of oral levosimendan in ALS is ongoing.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsSimendanTreatment OutcomeVital CapacityPhosphodiesterase 3 InhibitorsSimendanamyotrophic lateral sclerosislevosimendanrespiratory functionSVC

Identifiers

PMID31315908
PMCPMC6817985
OpenAlexW2962274488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.