Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315879›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Acceptability and implementation challenges of smartphone-based training of community health nurses for visual inspection with acetic acid in Ghana: mHealth and cervical cancer screening.

Ramin Asgary, Helen Cole, Philip Adongo, Ada Nwameme, Ernest Maya, Amanda Adu-Amankwah, Hannah Barnett, Richard Adanu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ramin AsgaryGlobal Health, George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Helen ColeEnvironmental Science and Technology, Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona Catalunya Spain, Barcelona, Spain.
Philip AdongoSocial and Behavioral Sciences, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Ada NwamemeSocial and Behavioral Sciences, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Ernest MayaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Amanda Adu-AmankwahPopulation, Family and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
Hannah BarnettGlobal Health, George Washington University Milken Institute of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Richard AdanuDean, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana.
University of Ghana · GHGeorge Washington University · USKorle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHMilken Institute · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore acceptability and feasibility of smartphone-based training of low-level to mid-level health professionals in cervical cancer screening using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA)/cervicography.

designIn 2015, we applied a qualitative descriptive approach and conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups to assess the perceptions and experiences of community health nurses (CHNs) (n=15) who performed smartphone-based VIA, patients undergoing VIA/cryotherapy (n=21) and nurse supervisor and the expert reviewer (n=2).

settingCommunity health centres (CHCs) in Accra, Ghana.

resultsThe 3-month smartphone-based training and mentorship was perceived as an important and essential complementary process to further develop diagnostic and management competencies. Cervical imaging provided peer-to-peer learning opportunities, and helped better communicate the procedure to and gain trust of patients, provide targeted education, improve adherence and implement quality control. None of the patients had prior screening; they overwhelmingly accepted smartphone-based VIA, expressing no significant privacy issues. Neither group cited significant barriers to performing or receiving VIA at CHCs, the incorporation of smartphone imaging and mentorship via text messaging. CHNs were able to leverage their existing community relationships to address a lack of knowledge and misperceptions. Patients largely expressed decision-making autonomy regarding screening. Negative views and stigma were present but not significantly limiting, and the majority felt that screening strategies were acceptable and effective.

conclusionsOur findings suggest the overall acceptability of this approach from the perspectives of all stakeholders with important promises for smartphone-based VIA implementation. Larger-scale health services research could further provide important lessons for addressing this burden in low-income and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Nurses, Community HealthSmartphoneAcetic AcidAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDiagnostic Tests, RoutineEarly Detection of CancerEducation, NursingFemaleHumansPhysical ExaminationQualitative ResearchTelemedicineUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcetic Acidacceptabilitycervical cancercommunity health nursesfeasibilityscreeningsmartphonesub-Saharan AfricaVIA

Identifiers

PMID31315879
PMCPMC6661590
OpenAlexW2959921249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.