ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2019
Cholestatic jaundice in infancy: struggling with many old and new phenotypes.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Saga of a Rare Congenital Bile Acid Synthesis Disorder: A Case Report.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2025Article
- ZFYVE19 gene mutation: A novel variant of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis.JPGN reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Case Report: Add-on treatment with odevixibat in a new subtype of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis broadens the therapeutic horizon of genetic cholestasis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Review
- A ZFYVE19 gene mutation associated with neonatal cholestasis and cilia dysfunction: case report with a novel pathogenic variant.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2021Article
- Best practices, challenges and innovations in pediatrics in 2019.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2020Review
- [Neonatal Cholestasis: A Narrative Review of the Working Group of the Latin American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition].Acta gastroenterologica LatinoamericanaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis is considered to be an extremely challenging process. Here we highlight the importance not only of the prompt distinction between extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholestasis forms, but also of the precise identification of the latter ones amongst the hotchpotch of recently discovered metabolic/genetic causes. Biliary atresia is considered a surgical emergency in a newborn infant. The rate of success in establishing the bile drainage is in fact a function of the early age when the hepato-portoenterostomy intervention is performed. Intrahepatic cholestasis is due to a broad and more and more puzzling variety of infectious, endocrine, genetic, metabolic and toxic disorders where Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase serum levels may help for differential diagnosis. Recently established laboratory diagnostic techniques have allowed to discover new causes of neonatal cholestasis. Aim of the Commentary is to go through some of them and bring the focus particularly on the information deriving from the paper by Pinon et al. in this issue of the Journal, which paves the way to the inclusion of the hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-beta deficiency as a new condition to consider in the diagnostic process of the syndromic forms with paucity of intralobular bile ducts.
conclusionNeonatal cholestasis poses diagnostic challenges in practice. Recent advances in the pathophysiology and in molecular genetics together with clinical features, histopathologic findings and careful reasoning remains paramount to put together the pieces of the jigsaw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.