Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315568›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2019

Detection of risk clusters for deaths due to tuberculosis specifically in areas of southern Brazil where the disease was supposedly a non-problem.

Luana Seles Alves, Danielle Talita Dos Santos, Marcos Augusto Moraes Arcoverde, Thais Zamboni Berra, Luiz Henrique Arroyo, Antônio Carlos Vieira Ramos, Ivaneliza Simionato de Assis, Ana Angélica Rêgo de Queiroz, Jonas Boldini Alonso, Josilene Dália Alves and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Luana Seles AlvesNursing Graduate Program in Public Health Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, 3900 Avenida dos Bandeirantes, São Paulo, Brazil. lu.selesrp@gmail.com.
Danielle Talita Dos SantosInter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Augusto Moraes ArcoverdeNursing Graduate Program in Public Health Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, 3900 Avenida dos Bandeirantes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thais Zamboni BerraNursing Graduate Program in Public Health Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, 3900 Avenida dos Bandeirantes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Henrique ArroyoInter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Antônio Carlos Vieira RamosNursing Graduate Program in Public Health Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, 3900 Avenida dos Bandeirantes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ivaneliza Simionato de AssisNursing Graduate Program in Public Health Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, 3900 Avenida dos Bandeirantes, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Angélica Rêgo de QueirozPublic Health, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Jonas Boldini AlonsoUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Josilene Dália AlvesInter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcela Paschoal PopolinDepartment of Nursing, Fasipe School, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Mellina YamamuraInter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliane de Almeida CrispimInter-institutions Doctoral Program in Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elma Mathias DessuntiDepartment of Nursing, Londrina State University, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Pedro Fredemir PalhaUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Francisco Chiaraval-NetoDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla NunesNational School of Public Health, Nova University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ricardo Alexandre ArcêncioUniversity of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto Nursing College, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Received financial assistance for partial expenses of the from the São Paulo Research Foundation (Process number: 2015/17586-3)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) is the infectious disease that kills the most people worldwide. The use of geoepidemiological techniques to demonstrate the dynamics of the disease in vulnerable communities is essential for its control. Thus, this study aimed to identify risk clusters for TB deaths and their variation over time.

methodsThis ecological study considered cases of TB deaths in residents of Londrina, Brazil between 2008 and 2015. We used standard, isotonic scan statistics for the detection of spatial risk clusters. The Poisson discrete model was adopted with the high and low rates option used for 10, 30 and 50% of the population at risk, with circular format windows and 999 replications considered the maximum cluster size. Getis-Ord Gi* (Gi*) statistics were used to diagnose hotspot areas for TB mortality. Kernel density was used to identify whether the clusters changed over time.

resultsFor the standard version, spatial risk clusters for 10, 30 and 50% of the exposed population were 4.9 (95% CI 2.6-9.4), 3.2 (95% CI: 2.1-5.7) and 3.2 (95% CI: 2.1-5.7), respectively. For the isotonic spatial statistics, the risk clusters for 10, 30 and 50% of the exposed population were 2.8 (95% CI: 1.5-5.1), 2.7 (95% CI: 1.6-4.4), 2.2 (95% CI: 1.4-3.9), respectively. All risk clusters were located in the eastern and northern regions of the municipality. Additionally, through Gi*, hotspot areas were identified in the eastern and western regions.

conclusionsThere were important risk areas for tuberculosis mortality in the eastern and northern regions of the municipality. Risk clusters for tuberculosis deaths were observed in areas where TB mortality was supposedly a non-problem. The isotonic and Gi* statistics were more sensitive for the detection of clusters in areas with a low number of cases; however, their applicability in public health is still restricted.

Indexed as

AdultBrazilCitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityRisk FactorsTuberculosisCluster detectionDeathIsotonic regressionScan statisticsSpatial analysisTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31315568
PMCPMC6637579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.