Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315177›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Effect of Staple Age on DNA Origami Nanostructure Assembly and Stability.

Charlotte Kielar, Yang Xin, Xiaodan Xu, Siqi Zhu, Nelli Gorin, Guido Grundmeier, Christin Möser, David M Smith, Adrian Keller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ion beam processing of DNA origami nanostructures.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Aptamers as Functional Modules for DNA Nanostructures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anion-specific structure and stability of guanidinium-bound DNA origami.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Challenges and Perspectives of DNA Nanostructures in Biomedicine.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Review
  14. At the Dawn of Applied DNA Nanotechnology.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte KielarTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Yang XinTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Xiaodan XuTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Siqi ZhuTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Nelli GorinTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Guido GrundmeierTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany.
Christin MöserDNA Nanodevices Unit, Department Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
David M SmithDNA Nanodevices Unit, Department Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology IZI, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Adrian KellerTechnical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Paderborn University, Warburger Str. 100, 33098 Paderborn, Germany. adrian.keller@uni-paderborn.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7139-3110
Paderborn University · DEFraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KE 1944/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA origami nanostructures are widely employed in various areas of fundamental and applied research. Due to the tremendous success of the DNA origami technique in the academic field, considerable efforts currently aim at the translation of this technology from a laboratory setting to real-world applications, such as nanoelectronics, drug delivery, and biosensing. While many of these real-world applications rely on an intact DNA origami shape, they often also subject the DNA origami nanostructures to rather harsh and potentially damaging environmental and processing conditions. Furthermore, in the context of DNA origami mass production, the long-term storage of DNA origami nanostructures or their pre-assembled components also becomes an issue of high relevance, especially regarding the possible negative effects on DNA origami structural integrity. Thus, we investigated the effect of staple age on the self-assembly and stability of DNA origami nanostructures using atomic force microscopy. Different harsh processing conditions were simulated by applying different sample preparation protocols. Our results show that staple solutions may be stored at -20 °C for several years without impeding DNA origami self-assembly. Depending on DNA origami shape and superstructure, however, staple age may have negative effects on DNA origami stability under harsh treatment conditions. Mass spectrometry analysis of the aged staple mixtures revealed no signs of staple fragmentation. We, therefore, attribute the increased DNA origami sensitivity toward environmental conditions to an accumulation of damaged nucleobases, which undergo weaker base-pairing interactions and thus lead to reduced duplex stability.

Indexed as

DNADrug StabilityDrug StorageMicroscopy, Atomic ForceModels, MolecularNanostructuresNucleic Acid ConformationDNAatomic force microscopyDNA origamistabilitystorage

Identifiers

PMID31315177
PMCPMC6680526
OpenAlexW2958149891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.