Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315065›Full record

ReviewPharmacological research2019

Epigenetic regulation of bone remodeling by natural compounds.

Nishikant Raut, Sheila M Wicks, Tempitope O Lawal, Gail B Mahady

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Steam-ProcessedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. iScience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Peonidin-3-Nutrients · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nishikant RautDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India.
Sheila M WicksDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Tempitope O LawalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Gail B MahadyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, WHO/PAHO Collaborating Centre for Traditional Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA. Electronic address: gail.mahady@gmail.com.
University of Illinois Chicago · USRush University · USUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

Osteogenic Effects of Dietary Anthocyanins in Transgenic MedakaR21AT008452 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MAHADY, GAIL B · 2015 to 2016
$429k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT008452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and osteopenia impact more than 54 million Americans, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Alterations in bone remodeling are the hallmarks for osteoporosis, and thus the development of novel treatments that will prevent or treat bone diseases would be clinically significant, and improve the quality of life for these patients. Bone remodeling involves the removal of old bone by osteoclasts and the formation of new bone by osteoblasts. This process is tightly coupled, and is essential for the maintenance of bone strength and integrity. Since the osteoclast is the only cell capable of bone resorption, the development of drugs to treat bone disorders has primarily focused on reducing osteoclast differentiation, maturation, and bone resorption mechanisms, and there are few treatments that actually increase bone formation. Evidence from observational, experimental, and clinical studies demonstrate a positive link between naturally occurring compounds and improved indices of bone health. While many natural extracts and compounds are reported to have beneficial effects on bone, only resveratrol, sulforaphane, specific phenolic acids and anthocyanins, have been shown to both increase bone formation and reduce resorption through their effects on the bone epigenome. Each of these compounds alters specific aspects of the bone epigenome to improve osteoblast differentiation, reduce osteoblast apoptosis, improve bone mineralization, and reduce osteoclast differentiation and function. This review focuses on these specific natural compounds and their epigenetic regulation of bone remodeling.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological ProductsBone RemodelingEpigenesis, GeneticHumansBiological ProductsAnthocyaninsDNA methylationFerulic acidNon-coding RNAOsteoblastOsteoclastResveratrolSulforaphaneSyringic acid

Identifiers

PMID31315065
PMCPMC6733678
OpenAlexW2959585389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.