Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31315044›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

Prefrontal Pathways Provide Top-Down Control of Memory for Sequences of Events.

Maanasa Jayachandran, Stephanie B Linley, Maximilian Schlecht, Stephen V Mahler, Robert P Vertes, Timothy A Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain-Wide Projections and Differential Encoding of Prefrontal Neuronal Classes Underlying Learned and Innate Threat Avoidance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maanasa JayachandranCognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Stephanie B LinleyCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Maximilian SchlechtCognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
Stephen V MahlerDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Robert P VertesCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
Timothy A AllenCognitive Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA; Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA. Electronic address: tallen@fiu.edu.

Funding

The role of the nucleus reuniens in the temporal organization of memory andbehaviorR01MH113626 · NIMH · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, TIMOTHY ALEXANDER · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
The Role of Medial Prefrontal Cortex in the Memory for Sequences of EventsF99NS119001 · NINDS · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI JAYACHANDRAN, MAANASA · 2021 to 2022
$77k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113626NINDS NIH HHS F99 NS119001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We remember our lives as sequences of events, but it is unclear how these memories are controlled during retrieval. In rats, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is positioned to influence sequence memory through extensive top-down inputs to regions heavily interconnected with the hippocampus, notably the nucleus reuniens of the thalamus (RE) and perirhinal cortex (PER). Here, we used an hM4Di synaptic-silencing approach to test our hypothesis that specific mPFC→RE and mPFC→PER projections regulate sequence memory retrieval. First, we found non-overlapping populations of mPFC cells project to RE and PER. Second, suppressing mPFC activity impaired sequence memory. Third, inhibiting mPFC→RE and mPFC→PER pathways effectively abolished sequence memory. Finally, a sequential lag analysis showed that the mPFC→RE pathway contributes to a working memory retrieval strategy, whereas the mPFC→PER pathway supports a temporal context memory retrieval strategy. These findings demonstrate that mPFC→RE and mPFC→PER pathways serve as top-down mechanisms that control distinct sequence memory retrieval strategies.

Indexed as

AnimalsClozapineGABA AntagonistsHippocampusMemory, Short-TermMidline Thalamic NucleiNeural PathwaysPerirhinal CortexPrefrontal CortexRatsRats, Long-EvansReceptor, Muscarinic M4Serotonin AntagonistsClozapineclozapine N-oxideGABA AntagonistsReceptor, Muscarinic M4Serotonin Antagonistscognitive controlDREADDsepisodic memoryhippocampusmemory retrievalnucleus reuniensperirhinal cortextemporal contextthalamusworking memory

Identifiers

PMID31315044
PMCPMC6662648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.