Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31314871›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2019

Risk factors and relationship between screening periodicity and risk of cervical cancer among nurses and midwives. A cross-sectional study.

Selda Yörük, Ayla Açıkgöz, Hülya Türkmen, Gül Ergör

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Moroccan Women's Attitudes Regarding Pap Smear Test and Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice Among Women: A Community Based Cross-Sectional Study Design.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Selda YörükPhD. Assistant Professor, Department of Midwifery, School of Health, Balıkesir University, Cagis Campus, Balıkesir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3840-1996
Ayla AçıkgözPhD. Lecturer, Vocational School of Health Services, Dokuz Eylül University , Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7749-705X
Hülya TürkmenPhD. Midwifery Lecturer, Department of Midwifery, School of Health, Balıkesir University, Cagis Campus, Balıkesir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-9352
Gül ErgörMD. Professor, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-7526
Balıkesir University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIf nurses and midwives undergo cervical cancer screening regularly, they can become role models for other women regarding this screening.

objectivesThe aims here were (i) to determine factors associated with undergoing cervical cancer screening; and (ii) to examine the association of cervical cancer screening periodicity with cervical cancer risk levels among nurses and midwives. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional study in a public hospital.

methods466 nurses and midwives participated in this study. The relationships between undergoing Pap smear screening and sociodemographic characteristics, cervical cancer risk factors, perception of cervical cancer risk and calculated cervical cancer risk levels were examined. Cervical cancer risk levels were determined using the "Your Disease Risk" assessment tool (Washington University).

results35% of the nurses and midwives had undergone Pap smear testing at least once in their lifetimes. The odds of having undergone Pap smear testing were higher among smokers (odds ratio, OR: 2.08; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.24-3.48) and among those who perceived their risk of cervical cancer to be high (OR: 3.60; 95% CI: 1.36-9.51). The frequency of undergoing Pap smear testing at least once in a lifetime was higher among primiparae (OR: 17.99; 95% CI: 6.36-50.84) and secundiparae (OR: 41.53; 95% CI: 15.01-114.91) than among nulliparae. No relationship was found between Pap smear test periodicity and calculated risk level.

conclusionThere is a need to assess motivational barriers that might lead to low levels of Pap smear screening among nurses and midwives who are role models for women regarding cervical cancer prevention.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMidwiferyNursesPapanicolaou TestRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31314871
PMCPMC9721239
OpenAlexW2961289004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.