Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31314794›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2019

The French Pregnancy Cohort: Medication use during pregnancy in the French population.

Anick Bérard, Fatima Abbas-Chorfa, Behrouz Kassai, Thierry Vial, Kim An Nguyen, Odile Sheehy, Anne-Marie Schott

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anick BérardResearch Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7535-5517
Fatima Abbas-ChorfaHospices Civils de Lyon, Service de biostatistique-bioinformatique, Pôle Santé Publique, Lyon, France.
Behrouz KassaiEPICIME-CIC 1407 Lyon, Inserm, Pharmacotoxicology Department, CHU-Lyon, Bron, France.
Thierry VialEPICIME-CIC 1407 Lyon, Inserm, Pharmacotoxicology Department, CHU-Lyon, Bron, France.
Kim An NguyenEPICIME-CIC 1407 Lyon, Inserm, Pharmacotoxicology Department, CHU-Lyon, Bron, France.
Odile SheehyResearch Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anne-Marie SchottHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAHospices Civils de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe described the medication use during pregnancy in the French population using the French Pregnancy Cohort (FPC).

methodsThe FPC was built with the sampling of all pregnant women included in the French Echantillon généraliste des bénéficiaires (EGB), which is a 1/97th representative sample of the population covered by the French health insurance. The EGB includes anonymized information on the socio-demographic and medical characteristics of beneficiaries, and the health care services they have received such as diagnoses and procedure codes as well as data on filled reimbursed medication; EGB also includes data on hospital stays in all public and private French health facilities. Each filled prescription record contains information on drug brand and generic names, date of prescription and date of dispensing, quantity dispensed, mode of administration, duration of prescription, dosage, and prescribing physician specialty. FPC includes data on all pregnancies of women in the EGB (2010-2013). Date of entry in the FPC is the first day of pregnancy regardless of pregnancy outcome (spontaneous abortions or planned abortions (with or without medical reasons), deliveries), and data on women are collected retrospectively for a period of one year before pregnancy, and prospectively during pregnancy, and up to one year after delivery. The prevalence of prescribed medications before, during and after pregnancy was compared; comparison was also done between trimesters. Pregnancy outcomes are described and include spontaneous and planned abortions, livebirths, and stillbirths.

resultsFPC includes data on 36,065 pregnancies. Among them, 27,253 (75.6%) resulted in a delivery including 201 stillbirths (0.7%). The total number of spontaneous abortions was 6,718 (18.6%), and planned abortions 2,094 (5.8%). The prevalence of filled medication use was 91.1%, 89.9%, and 95.6% before, during and after pregnancy, respectively. Although there was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of use once the pregnancy was diagnosed (first trimester exposure, 76.4% vs. exposure in the year prior to pregnancy, 91.1% (p < .01)), post-pregnancy medication use was above the pre-pregnancy level (95.6%). Maternal depression was the most prevalent comorbidity during pregnancy (20%), and post-partum depression was higher in those who delivered a stillborn infant (38.8%) as well as in those with a spontaneous (19.5%) or planned abortion (22.4%) compared to those with a liveborn (12.0%).

conclusionFPC is an excellent tool for the study of the risk and benefit of drug use during the perinatal period. FPC has the advantage of including a representative sample of French pregnant women, and study medications only available in France in addition to others available worldwide.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAbortion, SpontaneousAdultCohort StudiesComorbidityDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug TherapyFemaleFranceHumansInsurance, HealthPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID31314794
PMCPMC6636733
OpenAlexW2958188060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.