Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31314747›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2019

Propofol Sedation Alters Perceptual and Cognitive Functions in Healthy Volunteers as Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

William L Gross, Kathryn K Lauer, Xiaolin Liu, Christopher J Roberts, Suyan Liu, Suneeta Gollapudy, Jeffrey R Binder, Shi-Jiang Li, Anthony G Hudetz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Increased task-relevant fMRI responsiveness in comatose cardiac arrest patients is associated with improved neurologic outcomes.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

William L GrossFrom the Departments of Anesthesiology (W.L.G., K.K.L., C.J.R., S.L., S.G.) Radiology (X.L.) Neurology (J.R.B., S.-J.L.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (A.G.H.).
Kathryn K Lauer
Xiaolin Liu
Christopher J Roberts
Suyan Liu
Suneeta Gollapudy
Jeffrey R Binder
Shi-Jiang Li
Anthony G Hudetz
Medical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Neuroimaging of Anesthetic Modulation of Human ConsciousnessR01GM103894 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Zirui Huang, Anthony George Hudetz · 2013 to 2026
$4.0M
Anesthesiology Research Training ProgramT32GM089586 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI EBERT, THOMAS JAY · 2010 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103894NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM089586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElucidating networks underlying conscious perception is important to understanding the mechanisms of anesthesia and consciousness. Previous studies have observed changes associated with loss of consciousness primarily using resting paradigms. The authors focused on the effects of sedation on specific cognitive systems using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging. The authors hypothesized deepening sedation would degrade semantic more than perceptual discrimination.

methodsDiscrimination of pure tones and familiar names were studied in 13 volunteers during wakefulness and propofol sedation targeted to light and deep sedation. Contrasts highlighted specific cognitive systems: auditory/motor (tones vs. fixation), phonology (unfamiliar names vs. tones), and semantics (familiar vs. unfamiliar names), and were performed across sedation conditions, followed by region of interest analysis on representative regions.

resultsDuring light sedation, the spatial extent of auditory/motor activation was similar, becoming restricted to the superior temporal gyrus during deep sedation. Region of interest analysis revealed significant activation in the superior temporal gyrus during light (t [17] = 9.71, P < 0.001) and deep sedation (t [19] = 3.73, P = 0.001). Spatial extent of the phonologic contrast decreased progressively with sedation, with significant activation in the inferior frontal gyrus maintained during light sedation (t [35] = 5.17, P < 0.001), which didn't meet criteria for significance in deep sedation (t [38] = 2.57, P = 0.014). The semantic contrast showed a similar pattern, with activation in the angular gyrus during light sedation (t [16] = 4.76, P = 0.002), which disappeared in deep sedation (t [18] = 0.35, P = 0.731).

conclusionsResults illustrate broad impairment in cognitive cortex during sedation, with activation in primary sensory cortex beyond loss of consciousness. These results agree with clinical experience: a dose-dependent reduction of higher cognitive functions during light sedation, despite partial preservation of sensory processes through deep sedation.

Indexed as

AdultBrainCognitionFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePropofolReference ValuesYoung AdultHypnotics and SedativesPropofol

Identifiers

PMID31314747
PMCPMC6640651
OpenAlexW2928138396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.