Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31314050›Full record

Trial reportJAMA cardiology2019

Effect of Simvastatin-Ezetimibe Compared With Simvastatin Monotherapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients 75 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Richard G Bach, Christopher P Cannon, Robert P Giugliano, Jennifer A White, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Erin A Bohula, Robert M Califf, Eugene Braunwald, Michael A Blazing

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00202878. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00202878 phase3completed

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Establish the Clinical Benefit and Safety of Vytorin (Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablet) vs Simvastatin Monotherapy in High-Risk Subjects Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome (IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial - IMPROVE IT)

Ran2005Enrolled18,144Registered outcomes4Posted comparisons4ConditionsHypercholesterolemia, Myocardial InfarctionArmsezetimibe/simvastatin, Placebo for ezetimibe 10 mg/simvastatin 40 mg combination, Placebo for simvastatin 40 mg, simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Comprehensive, Updated Review of Ezetimibe: Evidence-Based Clinical Use for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. 2023 China Guidelines for Lipid Management.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Richard G BachCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Christopher P CannonTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert P GiuglianoTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer A WhiteDuke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Yuliya LokhnyginaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Erin A BohulaTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert M CaliffDuke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Eugene BraunwaldTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael A BlazingDuke Clinical Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USClinical Research Institute · USDuke University · USThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Limited evidence is available regarding the benefit and hazard of higher-intensity treatment to lower lipid levels among patients 75 years or older. As a result, guideline recommendations differ for this age group compared with younger patients. Objective: To determine the effect on outcomes and risks of combination ezetimibe and simvastatin compared with simvastatin monotherapy to lower lipid levels among patients 75 years or older with stabilized acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Design, Setting, Participants: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the global, multicenter, prospective clinical randomized Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT), outcomes and risks were compared by age among patients 50 years or older after a hospitalization for ACS. Data were collected from October 26, 2005, through July 8, 2010, with the database locked October 21, 2014. Data were analyzed May 29, 2015, through March 13, 2018, using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Interventions: Double-blind randomized assignment to combined simvastatin and ezetimibe or simvastatin and placebo with follow-up for a median of 6 years (interquartile range, 4.3-7.1 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary composite end point consisted of death due to cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and coronary revascularization after 30 days. Individual adverse ischemic and safety end points and lipid variables were also analyzed. Results: Of 18 144 patients enrolled (13 728 men [75.7%]; mean [SD] age, 64.1 [9.8] years), 5173 (28.5%) were 65 to 74 years old, and 2798 (15.4%) were 75 years or older at randomization. Treatment with simvastatin-ezetimibe resulted in lower rates of the primary end point than simvastatin-placebo, including 0.9% for patients younger than 65 years (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05) and 0.8% for patients 65 to 74 years of age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.06), with the greatest absolute risk reduction of 8.7% for patients 75 years or older (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90) (P = .02 for interaction). The rate of adverse events did not increase with simvastatin-ezetimibe vs simvastatin-placebo among younger or older patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In IMPROVE-IT, patients hospitalized for ACS derived benefit from higher-intensity therapy to lower lipid levels with simvastatin-ezetimibe compared with simvastatin monotherapy, with the greatest absolute risk reduction among patients 75 years or older. Addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin was not associated with any significant increase in safety issues among older patients. These results may have implications for guideline recommendations regarding lowering of lipid levels in the elderly. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00202878.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAge FactorsDouble-Blind MethodEzetimibe, Simvastatin Drug CombinationFemaleHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSimvastatinEzetimibe, Simvastatin Drug CombinationHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID31314050
PMCPMC6647004
OpenAlexW2960826213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.