Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31313886›Full record

Trial reportActa ophthalmologica2020

Bifocals reduce strabismus in children with Down syndrome: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial.

Christine de Weger, Nienke Boonstra, Jeroen Goossens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta ophthalmologica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Ophthalmic Manifestations of Down Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Down syndrome: a review of ocular manifestations.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine de WegerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6846-9855
Nienke BoonstraDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen GoossensDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

LSBS 2013-23Novartis 2013-23ODAS Stichting 2013-23Oogfonds 2013-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChildren with Down syndrome (DS) more often have strabismus, refractive errors, accommodative lags and reduced visual acuity (VA) than typically developing children. In this study, we compare the effects of bifocal glasses with those of unifocal glasses in children with DS. Changes in angle of strabismus, accommodation and refractive error were analysed in this paper.

methodsIn a multicentre randomized controlled trial, 119 children with DS, aged 2-16, were randomly allocated for bifocal or unifocal glasses (with full correction of refractive error in cycloplegia). The 15 centres, all in the Netherlands, followed the participants for 1 year. Changes in refractive error, accommodative accuracy, strabismus, binocularity and stereopsis were compared across 4 subsequent visits.

resultsRefractive errors and accommodative errors showed no significant change throughout the course of our study in either intervention group. The manifest angle of strabismus, however, reduced significantly in the bifocal group. This improvement was observed shortly after the children received their new correction (~6 weeks) (linear regression: t = 3.652, p < 0.001) and remained present in the final measurements after 1 year (linear regression: t = 3.604, p < 0.001). The percentage of children with positive binocularity and stereo tests showed no significant differences between the groups.

conclusionBifocals with full correction of refractive error reduce the manifest angle of strabismus within a few weeks. No effects on accommodation, refractive error, stereopsis and binocularity occurred over the course of 1 year.

Indexed as

EyeglassesVisual AcuityAccommodation, OcularAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDepth PerceptionDown SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesStrabismusconventional strabismus treatmentesotropianear addition in childrenocular accommodationocular alignmentrefractive error

Identifiers

PMID31313886
PMCPMC7003890
OpenAlexW2959343721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.