Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31313537›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2019

Improvements to an optical scintillator imaging-based tissue dosimetry system.

Irwin I Tendler, Petr Bruza, Michael Jermyn, Antoine Fleury, Benjamin B Williams, Lesley A Jarvis, Brian W Pogue, David J Gladstone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Color Cherenkov imaging of clinical radiation therapy.Light, science & applications · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Experimentally Observed Cherenkov Light Generation in the Eye During Radiation Therapy.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Irwin I TendlerDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Petr BruzaDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Michael JermynDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Antoine FleuryDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Benjamin B WilliamsDartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Lesley A JarvisDartmouth College, Geisel School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Brian W PogueDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
David J GladstoneDartmouth College, Thayer School of Engineering, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States.
Dartmouth College · USUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · USCotton (United States) · USDoseOptics (United States) · US

Funding

OPTICAL CHERENKOV IMAGING DOSIMETRY IN HUMAN RADIOTHERAPYR01EB023909 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GLADSTONE, DAVID J., JARVIS, LESLEY A · 2017 to 2024
$4.4M
Optical imaging for radiation therapy dose verification on patientsR44CA199836 · NCI · DOSEOPTICS, LLC · PI WARE, WILLIAM · 2015 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA199836NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work has shown that capturing optical emission from plastic discs attached directly to the skin can be a viable means to accurately measure surface dose during total skin electron therapy. This method can provide accurate dosimetric information rapidly and remotely without the need for postprocessing. The objective of this study was to: (1) improve the robustness and usability of the scintillators and (2) enhance sensitivity of the optical imaging system to improve scintillator emission detection as related to tissue surface dose. Baseline measurements of scintillator optical output were obtained by attaching the plastic discs to a flat tissue phantom and simultaneously irradiating and imaging them. Impact on underlying surface dose was evaluated by placing the discs on-top of the active element of an ionization chamber. A protective coating and adhesive backing were added to allow easier logistical use, and they were also subjected to disinfection procedures, while verifying that these changes did not affect the linearity of response with dose. The camera was modified such that the peak of detector quantum efficiency better overlapped with the emission spectra of the scintillating discs. Patient imaging was carried out and surface dose measurements were captured by the updated camera and compared to those produced by optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLD). The updated camera was able to measure surface dose with < 3 %   difference compared to OSLD–Cherenkov emission from the patient was suppressed and scintillation detection was enhanced by 25 × and 7 ×  , respectively. Improved scintillators increase underlying surface dose on average by 5.2  ±  0.1 %   and light output decreased by 2.6  ±  0.3 %  . Disinfection had < 0.02 %   change on scintillator light output. The enhanced sensitivity of the imaging system to scintillator optical emission spectrum can now enable a reduction in physical dimensions of the dosimeters without loss in ability to detect light output.

Indexed as

Gamma CamerasOptical ImagingScintillation CountingEquipment DesignHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingWhole Body Imagingbiomedical opticscameramedical imagingoptical devicesradiation oncologyscintillation

Identifiers

PMID31313537
PMCPMC6630097
OpenAlexW2960420887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.