Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31313348›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of eating disorders2019

Moving beyond self-report data collection in the natural environment: A review of the past and future directions for ambulatory assessment in eating disorders.

Kathryn E Smith, Tyler B Mason, Adrienne Juarascio, Lauren M Schaefer, Ross D Crosby, Scott G Engel, Stephen A Wonderlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of eating disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Enhancing Motivation to Reduce Restrictive Eating: A Novel Approach.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kathryn E SmithCenter for Bio-behavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-0060
Tyler B MasonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-7890
Adrienne JuarascioDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lauren M SchaeferCenter for Bio-behavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota.
Ross D CrosbyCenter for Bio-behavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota.
Scott G EngelCenter for Bio-behavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota.
Stephen A WonderlichCenter for Bio-behavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota.

Funding

Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has been used to repeatedly assess eating disorder (ED) symptoms in naturalistic settings, which has allowed for increased understanding of temporal processes that potentiate ED behaviors. However, there remain notable limitations of self-report EMA, and with the rapid proliferation of technology there are ever-increasing possibilities to improve ambulatory assessment methods to further the understanding and treatment of EDs. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to (a) systematically review the studies in EDs that have utilized ambulatory assessment methods other than self-report, and (b) provide directions for future research and clinical applications.

methodA systematic literature search of electronic databases was conducted, and data regarding study characteristics and methodological quality were extracted.

resultsThe search identified 17 studies that used ambulatory assessment methods to gather objective data, and focused primarily on autonomic functioning, physical activity, and cognitive processes in ED and control groups. DISCUSSION: Together the literature demonstrates the promise of using a range of ecologically valid ambulatory assessment approaches in EDs, though there remains limited research that has utilized methods other than self-report (e.g., wearable sensors), particularly in recent years. Going forward, there are several technology-enhanced momentary assessment methods that have potential to improve the understanding and treatment of EDs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildData CollectionEnvironmentFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansMiddle AgedSelf ReportYoung Adultambulatory assessmenteating disorderecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingnaturalistic assessmentprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID31313348
PMCPMC6942694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.