Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31313340›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Pharmacist-led, video-stimulated feedback to reduce prescribing errors in doctors-in-training: A mixed methods evaluation.

Hazel Parker, Odran Farrell, Rob Bethune, Ali Hodgetts, Karen Mattick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hazel ParkerPharmacy Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8569-5718
Odran FarrellPharmacy Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Rob BethuneExeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Ali HodgettsPharmacy Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Karen MattickUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1800-773X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo develop and evaluate a feasible, authentic pharmacist-led prescribing feedback intervention for doctors-in-training, to reduce prescribing errors.

methodsThis was a mixed methods study. Sixteen postgraduate doctors-in training, rotating though the surgical assessment unit of 1 UK hospital, were filmed taking a medication history with a patient and prescribing medications. Each doctor reviewed their video footage and made plans to improve their prescribing, supported by feedback from a pharmacist. Quantitative data in the form of prescribing error prevalence data were collected on 1 day per week before, during and after the intervention period (between November 2015 and March 2017). Qualitative data in the form of individual semi-structured interviews were collected with a subset of participants, to evaluate their experience. Quantitative data were analysed using a statistical process chart and qualitative data were transcribed and analysed thematically.

resultsDuring the data collection period, 923 patient drug charts were reviewed by pharmacists who identified 1219 prescribing errors overall. Implementation of this feedback approach was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of prescribing errors, from 19.0/d to 11.7/d (estimated to equate to 38% reduction; P < .0001). Pharmacist-led video-stimulated prescribing feedback was feasible and positively received by participants, who appreciated the reinforcement of good practice as well as the opportunity to reflect on and improve practice.

conclusionsFeedback to doctors-in-training tends to be infrequent and often negative, but this feasible feedback strategy significantly reduced prescribing errors and was well received by the target audience as a supportive developmental approach.

Indexed as

AdultFeedbackFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMedication ErrorsPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalPhysiciansPractice Patterns, Physicians'United KingdomVideo RecordingYoung Adultclinical pharmacymedical educationmedication errorspatient safetyprescribing

Identifiers

PMID31313340
PMCPMC6783579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.