ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020
Long-Term Outcomes of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Microwave Ablation in Elderly Patients with Recurrent Medium or Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2024Article
- Recent advances in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma therapy.World journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Radiological findings in non-surgical recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: From locoregional treatments to immunotherapy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Current status and prospect of treatments for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of hepatology · 2023Review
- Salvage locoregional therapies for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Combining local regional therapy and systemic therapy: Expected changes in the treatment landscape of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Review
- Combined treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma: Time to put them in the guidelines?World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an update.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Radiofrequency AblationFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after resection.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Article
- A Matter of TACEte: Plain Vanilla or Combination?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Article
- Prognostic Stratification Based on a Novel Nomogram for Solitary Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is lack of data for identifying optimal local therapy for the management of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatic resection.
aimsA retrospective study was performed to compare the effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of TACE alone for recurrent HCC.
methodsFrom 2007 to 2013, patients with recurrent HCC ≤ 5 cm were treated with either TACE plus RFA (n = 96) or TACE (n = 63). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to make allowances for imbalances in treatment assignment. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsThe TACE group had lower pretreatment Child-Pugh class (P = 0.025) and shorter pretreatment interval of recurrence (P = 0.028). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS rates for the TACE-RFA group were 55.1%, 22.5%, and 9.7%, respectively, and 41.1%, 9.9%, and 4.9%, respectively, for the TACE group. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 82.3%, 42.7%, and 16.5%, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group, and 75.9%, 30.7%, and 11.3%, respectively, in the TACE group. Cirrhosis was significantly associated with disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53; 95% CI 1.09-2.14; P = 0.014).
conclusionsIn patients with recurrent HCC ≤ 5 cm, TACE-RFA shows better DFS than TACE alone as a first-line local therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31312995What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.