Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312991›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2020

Predictive Factors of Mild and Severe Fibrosis in Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Hideyuki Chiba, Jun Tachikawa, Jun Arimoto, Keiichi Ashikari, Hiroki Kuwabara, Michiko Nakaoka, Toru Goto, Ken Ohata, Atsushi Nakajima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hideyuki ChibaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan. h.chiba04@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-509X
Jun TachikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
Jun ArimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
Keiichi AshikariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Hiroki KuwabaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
Michiko NakaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
Toru GotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
Ken OhataDepartment of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, 5-9-22 Higashi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 141-8625, Japan.
Atsushi NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPNTT Medical Center · JPOtsu Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsVarying degrees of fibrosis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) make the procedure difficult. Consensus on the predictive factors of fibrosis degree (mild or severe) has not been established. We conducted a study to identify the predictive factors and to examine the feasibility of ESD for fibrotic lesions. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe included 518 patients who had undergone ESD for 558 lesions from April 2012-September 2018. Patients were classified into fibrosis or no-fibrosis groups, and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors of fibrosis. Subgroup analyses were performed for fibrosis degree.

resultsThe total incidence of fibrosis was 21.1% (mild: 14.1%; severe: 7.1%). Although the curative resection rate (free margin: invasion depth less than 1000 μm: no lymphatic invasion, vascular involvement) was lower in the fibrosis group compared with the control (80.7% vs. 97.6%), neither the en bloc resection rate (99.1% vs. 100%) nor incidence of perforation (0.9% vs. 0.2%) differed between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that a cecal location, preoperative biopsy, straddling fold, laterally spreading tumor-non-granular-pseudo-depressed (LST-NG-PD) type were predictive of mild fibrosis. The presence of a straddling fold and a protruded lesion were independent predictive factors of severe fibrosis.

conclusionsWe identified the predictive factors of mild and severe fibrosis. It is preferable that a more experienced physician performs ESD for the lesions with F2 fibrosis.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFibrosisHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerComplicationEndoscopic submucosal dissectionFibrosis

Identifiers

PMID31312991
OpenAlexW2959707018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.