Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312988›Full record

ReviewClinical rheumatology2020

SAPHO: has the time come for tailored therapy?

Adelaide Sofia Batalha Figueiredo, Ana Luísa Oliveira, António Caetano, Maria Francisca Moraes-Fontes

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adelaide Sofia Batalha FigueiredoUnidade de Doenças Auto-imunes/Serviço Medicina 7.2, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal. adelaide.sofia.figueiredo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5966-2848
Ana Luísa OliveiraUnidade de Doenças Auto-imunes/Serviço Medicina 7.2, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
António CaetanoServiço de Radiologia do Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria Francisca Moraes-FontesUnidade de Doenças Auto-imunes/Serviço Medicina 7.2, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis and osteitis) syndrome is a heterogeneous condition combining osteoarticular and cutaneous manifestations. Conventional treatments are mostly ineffective. We hereby report two patients, the first with an aggressive form of disease and the second with an incomplete response to two different anti-TNF-α agents. Both were successfully treated with tocilizumab and ustekinumab, respectively, over a long period of time. A narrative review of a biological therapy in SAPHO syndrome yielded very little information on the specific use of these agents. We highlight the advantages of personalising therapy and describe emerging promising treatments for this disease.

Indexed as

Acquired Hyperostosis SyndromeAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBone and BonesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadionuclide ImagingTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsUstekinumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedtocilizumabTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsUstekinumabAnti-IL-12/IL-23 agentsAnti-IL-1 agentsAnti-IL-6 agentsAnti-TNF-α agentsSAPHO syndromeTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.