Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312924›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Inter-rater reliability of seven neurolaryngologists in laryngeal EMG signal interpretation.

Guan-Yuh Ho, Matthias Leonhard, Gerd Fabian Volk, Gerhard Foerster, Claus Pototschnig, Kathleen Klinge, Thordis Granitzka, Anne-Kristin Zienau, Berit Schneider-Stickler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Objectivation of laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) data: turn number vs. qualitative analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guan-Yuh HoDivision of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias LeonhardDivision of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. matthias.leonhard@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7311-8526
Gerd Fabian VolkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Gerhard FoersterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, SHR Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.
Claus PototschnigDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kathleen KlingeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, SHR Wald-Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany.
Thordis GranitzkaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Anne-Kristin ZienauDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Berit Schneider-SticklerDivision of Phoniatrics-Logopedics, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jena University Hospital · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DEUniversität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLaryngeal electromyography (LEMG) has been considered as gold standard in diagnostics of vocal fold movement impairment, but is still not commonly implemented in clinical routine. Since the signal interpretation of LEMG signals (LEMGs) is often a subjective and semi-quantitative matter, the goal of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of neurolaryngologists on LEMGs of volitional muscle activity.

methodsFor this study, 52 representative LEMGs of 371 LEMG datasets were selected from a multicenter registry for a blinded evaluation by 7 experienced members of the neurolaryngology working group of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). For the measurement of the observer agreement between two raters, Cohen's Kappa statistic was calculated. For the interpretation of agreements of diagnoses among the seven examiners, we used the Fleiss' Kappa statistic.

resultWhen focusing on the categories "no activity", "single fiber pattern", and "strongly decreased recruitment pattern", the inter-rater agreement varied from Cohen's Kappa values between 0.48 and 0.84, indicating moderate to near-perfect agreement between the rater pairs. Calculating with Fleiss' Kappa, a value of 0.61 showed good agreement among the seven raters. For the rating categories, the Fleiss' Kappa value ranged from 0.52 to 0.74, which also showed a good agreement.

conclusionA good inter-rater agreement between the participating neurolaryngologists was achieved in the interpretation of LEMGs. More instructional courses should be offered to broadly implement LEMG as a reliable diagnostic tool in evaluating vocal fold movement disorders in clinical routine and to develop future algorithms for therapy and computer-assisted examination.

Indexed as

Vocal CordsAlgorithmsElectromyographyEuropeHumansLaryngeal NervesObserver VariationOtolaryngologyRegistriesReproducibility of ResultsVocal Cord ParalysisInter-rater reliabilityKappa statisticLaryngeal electromyographyLaryngologyVocal fold paresis

Identifiers

PMID31312924
PMCPMC6757022
OpenAlexW2960048680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.