Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312805›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine

Machine-learning Prognostic Models from the 2014-16 Ebola Outbreak: Data-harmonization Challenges, Validation Strategies, and mHealth Applications.

Andres Colubri, Mary-Anne Hartley, Matthew Siakor, Vanessa Wolfman, August Felix, Tom Sesay, Jeffrey G Shaffer, Robert F Garry, Donald S Grant, Adam C Levine and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Refining early detection of Marburg Virus Disease (MVD) in Rwanda: Leveraging predictive symptom clusters to enhance case definitions.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An intelligent framework to predict socioeconomic impacts of COVID-19 and public sentiments.Computers & electrical engineering : an international journal · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Comprehensive Review.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Is There a Place for Responsible Artificial Intelligence in Pandemics? A Tale of Two Countries.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andres ColubriHarvard University, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, USA.
Mary-Anne HartleyUniversity of Lausanne, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Matthew SiakorInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, USA.
Vanessa WolfmanInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, USA.
August FelixBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, USA.
Tom SesayMinistry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Jeffrey G ShafferTulane University, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, USA.
Robert F GarryTulane University, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, New Orleans, USA.
Donald S GrantViral Hemorrhagic Fever Program, Kenema Government Hospital, Kenema, Sierra Leone.
Adam C LevineInternational Medical Corps, Los Angeles, USA.
Pardis C SabetiHarvard University, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

Viral Genomics: evolution, spread, and host interactionsU19AI110818 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CUOMO, CHRISTINA A · 2014 to 2024
$66.5M
Technology CoreU19AI135995 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI Robert F Garry · 2018 to 2026
$32.0M
Mechanistic Virology CoreU19AI109762 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI LAI, JONATHAN R. · 2014 to 2018
$29.6M
Structure-based design of novel Lassa virus glycoproteins for vaccine developmentR01AI132244 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI GARRY, ROBERT F · 2017 to 2021
$6.5M
Elucidating Genetic Determinants of Resistance to Lassa Hemorrhagic FeverR01AI114855 · NIAID · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SABETI, PARDIS CHRISTINE · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Project 2. Expansion of Clinical Research Capacity at Kenema Government HospitalU19AI115589 · NIAID · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI GARRY, ROBERT F · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Host and Microbial Genetic Determinants of Febrile Illness in West AfricaU01HG007480 · NHGRI · REDEEMER'S UNIVERSITY · PI HAPPI, CHRISTIAN T. · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007480NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400048CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI114855NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132244NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109762NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110818NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI115589NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEbola virus disease (EVD) plagues low-resource and difficult-to-access settings. Machine learning prognostic models and mHealth tools could improve the understanding and use of evidence-based care guidelines in such settings. However, data incompleteness and lack of interoperability limit model generalizability. This study harmonizes diverse datasets from the 2014-16 EVD epidemic and generates several prognostic models incorporated into the novel

methodsMultivariate logistic regression was applied to investigate survival outcomes in 470 patients admitted to five Ebola treatment units in Liberia and Sierra Leone at various timepoints during 2014-16. We generated a parsimonious model (viral load, age, temperature, bleeding, jaundice, dyspnea, dysphagia, and time-to-presentation) and several fallback models for when these variables are unavailable. All were externally validated against two independent datasets and compared to further models including expert observational wellness assessments. Models were incorporated into an app highlighting the signs/symptoms with the largest contribution to prognosis.

findingsThe parsimonious model approached the predictive power of observational assessments by experienced clinicians (Area-Under-the-Curve, AUC = 0.70-0.79, accuracy = 0.64-0.74) and maintained its performance across subcohorts with different healthcare seeking behaviors. Age and viral load contributed > 5-fold the weighting of other features and including them in a minimal model had a similar AUC, albeit at the cost of specificity.

interpretationClinically guided prognostic models can recapitulate clinical expertise and be useful when such expertise is unavailable. Incorporating these models into mHealth tools may facilitate their interpretation and provide informed access to comprehensive clinical guidelines.

fundingHoward Hughes Medical Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, International Medical Corps, UK Department for International Development, and GOAL Global.

Indexed as

Clinical intuitionData visualizationEbola virus diseaseMachine learningmHealthPrognostic modelsSeverity scoreSupportive care guidelines

Identifiers

PMID31312805
PMCPMC6610774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.