Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312789›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2019

Imaging Findings and Clinicopathological Correlation of Breast Cancer in Women under 40 Years Old.

Gamze Durhan, Aynur Azizova, Ömer Önder, Kemal Kösemehmetoğlu, Jale Karakaya, Meltem Gülsün Akpınar, Figen Demirkazık, Ayşegül Üner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breast cancer in a Hispanic patient with Werner syndrome.Journal of radiology case reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Type 2 dynamic curves: A diagnostic dilemma.World journal of radiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gamze DurhanDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6281-9287
Aynur AzizovaDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9354-2612
Ömer ÖnderDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8701-5974
Kemal KösemehmetoğluDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7747-0460
Jale KarakayaDepartment of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7222-7875
Meltem Gülsün AkpınarDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1578-5624
Figen DemirkazıkDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-840X
Ayşegül ÜnerDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2522-1606

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, imaging and histopathological features of breast cancer in patients aged under 40 years of age. The relationship between radiological characteristics and histopathological features was also investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 131 patients aged under 40 years, diagnosed pathologically with breast cancer. A retrospective evaluation was made of the imaging and clinicopathological findings and the relationship between pathological and imaging findings was investigated.

resultsMost of the cancers were detected from clinical symptoms, especially a palpable mass (76.3%). The most common histological type of tumor was invasive ductal carcinoma and 64.8% of the tumors were high grade tumors. The predominant features were irregular borders (92.4%), microlobulated-angulated contours (43.5%), hypo-homogeneous internal echogenicity (80.9%) on ultrasonography, and the presence of a mass (41.2%) and suspicious microcalcifications (40.2%) on mammography. Magnetic resonance imaging commonly showed mass enhancement (66.7%) with type 2 or 3 dynamic curve (92.6%). High-grade tumors were associated with posterior acoustic enhancement (p: 0.03) while low-grade tumors presented with spiculated margins more than high grade tumors (p: 0.04).

conclusionBreast cancer in women aged under 40 years usually presents with a self-detected palpable mass and can show different imaging findings according to the histological grade. Ultrasonography is the main modality for the diagnosis of breast cancer in young women, but mammography and magnetic resonance imaging can help in both diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of disease.

Indexed as

breast cancerpathology featuresradiological findingsYoung women

Identifiers

PMID31312789
PMCPMC6619779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.