ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2019
Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Foot Function Index in Patients with Foot Disorders.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Pain and Foot Function Index in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis.Bioelectromagnetics · 2026Trial
- Adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the foot Health Status Questionnaire in patients with plantar pain: evaluation of test-retest.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Sonographic Evaluation of the Superficial Back Line Myofascial Release in Plantar Fasciitis: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties of foot function index in Urdu-speaking population with ankle and foot disorders.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Effect of Medial Longitudinal Arch Height of the Foot on Static and Dynamic Balance in 7-10-Year-Old Boy Gymnasts.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024Article
- Foot Function Index for Arabic-speaking patients (FFI-Ar): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2022Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the foot function index in patients with chronic lateral ankle instability.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2022Article
- Lisfranc fleck sign: characteristics and clinical outcomes following fixation using a percutaneous position Lisfranc screw.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Clinical and radiological outcomes after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Thai version of the foot function index: a cross-cultural adaptation with reliability and validity evaluation.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoot function index (FFI) is a worthy subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROM) tool for evaluation of the outcomes of medical interventions on foot and ankle. This study was conducted to assess the validity of the Persian version of the foot function index (FFI).
methodsAfter translating the original FFI into Persian, back-translation was performed on the agreed Persian version and the final version was established. A total of 113 Persian-speaking patients with foot and ankle problems were enrolled in this study and were asked to fill in the FFI.
resultsThe Cronbach's alpha for subsections of FFI and MOXFQ was above 0.8 and 0.7, respectively, while it was 0.95 and 0.93 for total FFI and MOXFQ, respectively. The ICC for all subsections of MOXFQ and FFI was above 0.7. The Pearson's correlation coefficient for all subsections of FFI and MOXFQ was significant (
conclusionThe Persian version of FFI is valid and reproducible in Persian speaking population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31312689PMC6578470What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.