ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2019
The Future of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology: Upcoming Technology and Evolution Within the Field.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flexible robotic platforms for surgical applications in microgravity environments: a comprehensive systematic review of minimally invasive mechatronic systems and the impact of artificial intelligence on behalf of the Center for Space Systems (C-SET) & TROGSS-The Robotic Global Surgical Society.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Global research trends in robot-assisted pediatric urological surgery: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Textbook Outcomes of Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary Neoplasm: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing pediatric robotic pyeloplasty with a no-touch urothelium approach: a case series.BMC urology · 2025Article
- A Narrative Review of the Evolving Role of Robotic Surgery in Pediatrics: Innovations and Future Prospects.Cureus · 2025Review
- Small Scale, High Precision: Robotic Surgery in Neonatal and Pediatric Patients-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Advancements in robotic surgery: innovations, challenges and future prospects.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Robot-assisted reconstructive surgery of lower urinary tract in children: a narrative review on technical aspects and current literature.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons' world: Current situation and future prospectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Pediatric robotic surgery: issues in management-expert consensus from the Italian Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI) and the Italian Society of Pediatric Surgery (SICP).Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Robotically Assisted Surgery in Children-A Perspective.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The Role of the Versius Surgical Robotic System in the Paediatric Population.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Trends in robotic surgery utilization across tertiary children's hospitals in the United States.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Cost-Efficient Video Synthesis and Evaluation for Development of Virtual 3D Endoscopy.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the introduction of the Da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) in 1999, the market for robot assisted laparoscopic surgery has grown with urology. The initial surgical advantage seen in adults was for robotic prostatectomy, and over time this expanded to the pediatric population with robotic pyeloplasty. The introduction of three-dimensional visualization, tremor elimination, a 4th arm, and 7-degree range of motion allowed a significant operator advantage over laparoscopy, especially for anastomotic suturing. After starting with pyeloplasty, the use of robotic technology with pediatric urology has expanded to include ureteral reimplantation and even more complex reconstructive procedures, such as enterocystoplasty, appendicovesicostomy, and bladder neck reconstruction. However, limitations of the Da Vinci Surgical Systems still exist despite its continued technological advances over multiple generations in the past 20 years. Due to the smaller pediatric market, less focus appears to have been placed on the development of the smaller 5 mm instruments. As pediatric urology continues to utilize robotic technology for minimally invasive surgery, there is hope that additional pediatric-friendly instruments and components will be developed, either by Intuitive Surgical or one of the new robotic platforms in development that are working to address many of the shortcomings of current systems. These new robotic platforms include improved haptic feedback systems, flexible scopes, easier maneuverability, and even adaptive machine learning concepts to bring robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery to the next level. In this report, we review the present and upcoming technological advances of the current Da Vinci surgical systems as well as various new robotic platforms, each offering a unique set of technological advantages. As technology progresses, the understanding of and access to these new robotic platforms will help guide pediatric urologists into the next forefront of minimally invasive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.