ArticleJournal of general and family medicine2019
Clinical background factors affecting outcomes of
Article in Journal of general and family medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of a semi-automatic, intensive follow-up for improving efficacy and adherence of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: A randomized controlled trial.MicrobiologyOpen · 2021Trial
- Predictors of Successful First-LineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical background factors affecting outcomes ofJournal of general and family medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFew studies have reported the influence of clinical background factors on the outcome of
methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who received
resultsThere were 369 patients (208 females, 161 male), with a mean age of 59 years (range 30-88 years). The middle-aged group (50-69 years) was associated with successful eradication therapy compared with the young group (30-49 years). The elderly group (>70 years) was associated with eradication therapy failure compared with the middle-aged group. The young group was associated with self-interruption of eradication therapy. There was a marginally significant association between male patients and self-interruption. Older attending physicians (>50 years) were also associated with failure compared with younger physicians. There was no difference in outcome of eradication therapy between generalists and gastroenterology specialists.
conclusionWe have identified clinical factors associated with success, failure, and self-interruption of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.