Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312491›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2019

Quantifying susceptibility of marine invertebrate biocomposites to dissolution in reduced pH.

Matthew Chadwick, Elizabeth M Harper, Anaëlle Lemasson, John I Spicer, Lloyd S Peck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Shell mineralogy of a foundational marine species,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew ChadwickDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3861-4564
Elizabeth M HarperDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK.
Anaëlle LemassonSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
John I SpicerSchool of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6861-4039
Lloyd S PeckBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocean acidification threatens many ecologically and economically important marine calcifiers. The increase in shell dissolution under the resulting reduced pH is an important and increasingly recognized threat. The biocomposites that make up calcified hardparts have a range of taxon-specific compositions and microstructures, and it is evident that these may influence susceptibilities to dissolution. Here, we show how dissolution (thickness loss), under both ambient and predicted end-century pH (approx. 7.6), varies between seven different bivalve molluscs and one crustacean biocomposite and investigate how this relates to details of their microstructure and composition. Over 100 days, the dissolution of all microstructures was greater under the lower pH in the end-century conditions. Dissolution of lobster cuticle was greater than that of any bivalve microstructure, despite its calcite mineralogy, showing the importance of other microstructural characteristics besides carbonate polymorph. Organic content had the strongest positive correlation with dissolution when all microstructures were considered, and together with Mg/Ca ratio, explained 80-90% of the variance in dissolution. Organic content, Mg/Ca ratio, crystal density and mineralogy were all required to explain the maximum variance in dissolution within only bivalve microstructures, but still only explained 50-60% of the variation in dissolution.

Indexed as

bivalvescrustaceansdissolutionmicrostructureocean acidification

Identifiers

PMID31312491
PMCPMC6599774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.