Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312430›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Ultraconserved element (UCE) probe set design: Base genome and initial design parameters critical for optimization.

Grey T Gustafson, Alana Alexander, John S Sproul, James M Pflug, David R Maddison, Andrew E Z Short

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grey T GustafsonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-7128
Alana AlexanderBiodiversity Institute University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6456-7757
John S SproulDepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-3537
James M PflugDepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon.
David R MaddisonDepartment of Integrative Biology Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7152-3824
Andrew E Z ShortDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence Kansas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7467-7116

Funding

U of Kansas/Haskell Indian Nations U.IRACDA ProjectK12GM063651 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI DE GUZMAN, ROBERTO N · 2002 to 2022
$10.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM063651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted capture and enrichment approaches have proven effective for phylogenetic study. Ultraconserved elements (UCEs) in particular have exhibited great utility for phylogenomic analyses, with the software package phyluce being among the most utilized pipelines for UCE phylogenomics, including probe design. Despite the success of UCEs, it is becoming increasing apparent that diverse lineages require probe sets tailored to focal taxa in order to improve locus recovery. However, factors affecting probe design and methods for optimizing probe sets to focal taxa remain underexplored. Here, we use newly available beetle (Coleoptera) genomic resources to investigate factors affecting UCE probe set design using phyluce. In particular, we explore the effects of stringency during initial design steps, as well as base genome choice on resulting probe sets and locus recovery. We found that both base genome choice and initial bait design stringency parameters greatly alter the number of resultant probes included in final probe sets and strongly affect the number of loci detected and recovered during in silico testing of these probe sets. In addition, we identify attributes of base genomes that correlated with high performance in probe design. Ultimately, we provide a recommended workflow for using phyluce to design an optimized UCE probe set that will work across a targeted lineage, and use our findings to develop a new, open-source UCE probe set for beetles of the suborder Adephaga.

Indexed as

bait designgenomicsphylogeneticsphylogenomicsprobe designultraconserved elements

Identifiers

PMID31312430
PMCPMC6617817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.