ArticleJournal of children's orthopaedics2019
The significance of foot length at the initiation of the Ponseti method: a prospective study.
Article in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The foot drawing method: reliability of measuring foot length and outward rotation in children with clubfoot.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Initiating Ponseti management in preterm infants with clubfoot at term age.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2022Article
- Ponseti treated idiopathic clubfoot - outcome predictive factors in the test of time: analysis of 500 feet followed for five to 20 years.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Development of foot length in children with congenital clubfoot up to 7 years of age: a prospective follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Special symposium issue: Clubfoot.Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Delayed ossification and abnormal development of tarsal bones in idiopathic clubfoot: should it affect bracing protocol when using the Ponseti method?Journal of children's orthopaedics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe sought to evaluate foot length (FL) and forefoot circumference (FC) and their impact on the severity of idiopathic clubfoot (CF) and results of treatment. We hypothesized that a smaller foot size at birth that represents a lesser than term newborn may affect the response of the CF to the treatment.
methodsWe conducted a prospective study documenting FL and FC of all neonates presented with idiopathic CF. Additional demographic information was collected. Outcome measures were number of casts needed for correction, need for recasting, additional surgery and functional score.
resultsIn all, 52 children with 73 CF with a minimum mean follow-up of two years (2.0 to 5.6; sd 1.08) were evaluated. Mean gestational age was 38.63 weeks and mean birth weight (BW) was 3184 g. The mean FL at presentation was 74 mm (5.70 to 9.00), initial Pirani score was 5.5 (2.5 to 6.0) while number of casts was 6.9 (4.0 to 11.0). The FL was significantly correlated both to initial Pirani score (r = -0.35; p < 0.01) and number of casts (r = -0.33; p < 0.05). Positive correlation was found between the number of casts to Pirani score and number of additional procedures (r = 0.39; r = 0.36; p < 0.01, respectively). A foot size of up to 8 cm, needed 7.3 casts (4 to 7) compared with a FL of 8 cm or longer who needed 4.7 casts (4 to 6; t = 7.11; p < 0.001).
conclusionFL is a simple approach to identify preterm babies. It can be used as part of the initial evaluation of CF and help in predicting the course of treatment. We recommend adding FL to the existing classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I - Prognostic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.