Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Explicit and Implicit Affect and Judgment in Schizotypy.

Elizabeth A Martin, Jessica P Y Hua, Kelsey T Straub, John G Kerns

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth A MartinDepartment of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Jessica P Y HuaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Kelsey T StraubDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
John G KernsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

Funding

Emotion regulation in emotional distress disorder: fMRI and ambulatory assessmentR21MH100359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI KERNS, JOHN G, TRULL, TIMOTHY J · 2014 to 2015
$404k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH100359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although emotion deficits in schizotypy have been reported, the exact nature of these deficits is now well understood. Specifically, for social anhedonia (SocAnh), there are questions about whether any decrease in positive affect only reflects an explicit bias not observed in other measures (e.g., implicit affect measure). At the same time, for individuals with elevated levels of perceptual aberrations or magical ideation (PerMag), there is some evidence of an increased influence of affect on judgment. It is also possible that the influence of implicit affect on judgment might be especially pronounced in PerMag; however, this has not been previously examined. The current study involved people with elevated levels of SocAnh (

Indexed as

IPANATmagical ideationnegative emotionperceptual aberrationspositive emotionsocial anhedonia

Identifiers

PMID31312158
PMCPMC6613436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.