Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31312074›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2019

Molecular docking and ADMET analysis of hydroxamic acids as HDAC2 inhibitors.

Murad Alsawalha, Srinivasa Rao Bolla, Naresh Kandakatla, Venkatesan Srinivasadesikan, Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan, Krishna Mohan Surapaneni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular design, synthesis andJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Murad AlsawalhaDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology, Jubail Industrial College (JIC), P.O. Box 10099, Jubail Industrial City 31961,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Srinivasa Rao BollaDepartment of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P.O.Box 2114,Dammam 31451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Naresh KandakatlaDepartment of Chemistry, Sathyabama University, Jeppiaar Nagar, Chennai - 600 119, Tamil Nadu, India, 600119.
Venkatesan SrinivasadesikanDepartment of Applied Chemistry, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan6Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University, 162, P. H. Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600 077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishna Mohan Surapaneni7Department of Medical Biochemistry, College of Applied Medical Sciences in Jubail (CAMSJ), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Jubail Industrial City 35816, Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylase (HDAC2) belongs to the hydrolase family and a promising target for cancers. We reported 96 hydroxamic compounds optimized using hydrogen-donors, hydrophobic and electron withdrawing groups followed by molecular docking studies. The optimized compounds show good LibDock score and H-bond interaction in the active site of HDAC2. We selected 20 compounds as the best HDAC2 inhibitors based on the LibDock score, binding energy and hydrogen bonding. ADMET predictions on these compounds show good absorption, BBB penetration and no liver toxicity. We subsequently report four compounds selected as best HDAC2 inhibitors based on the LibDock, binding energy, H-bonding and ADMET properties.

Indexed as

ADMEThistone deacetylase 2hydroxamic acidsmolecular docking

Identifiers

PMID31312074
PMCPMC6614126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.