Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311934›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Cerebellar disruption impairs working memory during evidence accumulation.

Ben Deverett, Mikhail Kislin, David W Tank, Samuel S-H Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cerebellar microcircuits enable robust evidence-based decisions through cortico-cerebellar coupling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?Trends in cognitive sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ben DeverettNeuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Mikhail KislinNeuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-8881
David W TankNeuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
Samuel S-H WangNeuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. sswang@princeton.edu.

Funding

Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TANK, DAVID W · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Imaging adaptive cerebellar processing at cellular resolution in awake miceR01NS045193 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SAMUEL SHENG-HUNG · 2003 to 2024
$7.5M
Cerebellar determinants of flexible and social behavior on rapid time scales in autism model mice.R01MH115750 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM, SHAEVITZ, JOSHUA W · 2017 to 2021
$4.7M
Cerebellar contributions to reward prediction and decision-makingF30MH115577 · NIMH · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DEVERETT, BEN · 2017 to 2020
$191k
NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH115577NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH115750NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045193NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To select actions based on sensory evidence, animals must create and manipulate representations of stimulus information in memory. Here we report that during accumulation of somatosensory evidence, optogenetic manipulation of cerebellar Purkinje cells reduces the accuracy of subsequent memory-guided decisions and causes mice to downweight prior information. Behavioral deficits are consistent with the addition of noise and leak to the evidence accumulation process. We conclude that the cerebellum can influence the accurate maintenance of working memory.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCerebellumCraniotomyDecision MakingFemaleMaleMemory, Short-TermMiceModels, AnimalOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationPurkinje Cells

Identifiers

PMID31311934
PMCPMC6635393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.