Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311770›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2019

The enigmatic role of Mfd in replication-transcription conflicts in bacteria.

Mark Ragheb, Houra Merrikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark RaghebMolecular and Cellular Biology Graduate Program and Medical Scientist Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Houra MerrikhDepartment of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37205, USA; Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. Electronic address: houra.merrikh@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance development in bacterial pathogensR01AI127422 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MERRIKH, HOURA · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts between replication and transcription can have life-threatening consequences. RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the major impediment to replication progression, and its efficient removal from DNA should mitigate the consequences of collisions with replication. Cells have various proteins that can resolve conflicts by removing stalled (or actively translocating) RNAP from DNA. It would therefore seem logical that RNAP-associated factors, such as the bacterial DNA translocase Mfd, would minimize the effects of conflicts. Despite seemingly conclusive statements in most textbooks, the role of Mfd in conflicts remains an enigma. In this review, we will discuss the different physical states of RNAP during transcription, and how each distinct state can influence conflict severity and potentially trigger the involvement of Mfd. We propose models to explain the contradictory conclusions from published studies on the potential role of Mfd in resolving conflicts.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliTranscription FactorsBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialTranscription Factorstranscription repair coupling factor protein, BacteriaMfdReplication-transcription conflictsReplisome-RNAP conflict resolution factors

Identifiers

PMID31311770
PMCPMC6892258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.