Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31311569›Full record

ArticleNutrition journal2019

Measuring food provision in Western Australian long day care (LDC) services: a weighed food record method/protocol at a service level.

Ros Sambell, Ruth Wallace, Leesa Costello, Johnny Lo, Amanda Devine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ros SambellEdith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia. r.sambell@ecu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-3441
Ruth WallaceEdith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Leesa CostelloEdith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Johnny LoEdith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.
Amanda DevineEdith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA, 6027, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are currently 1.3 million children utilising Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) services in Australia. Long day care (LDC), family day care and out of school hours care currently provide this service in different environments. This research reports findings from a LDC perspective. Children can consume 40-67% of their food intake whilst at LDC services, this highlights the importance of monitoring food provision at a service level. There are several methods to measure food provision which typically focus on intake at an individual level. There is limited evidence of measuring food provision accurately at a service level and for young children. Accurate and consistent dietary assessment methods are required to determine compliance with dietary guidelines and to provide rigour for comparison between studies.

methodsConvenience sampling was used to recruit 30 LDC services and food provision assessed over two consecutive days. To ensure consistency, trained researchers weighed raw food ingredients used in food preparation at each service. Food and food weights were allocated to food groups to determine average serves of food group provision at morning tea, lunch and afternoon tea per child. All data were entered into Foodworks for dietary analysis and compliance with dietary guidelines was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and one-sample t-tests (SPSS). DISCUSSION: This paper outlines the process of data collection for the measurement and auditing of food provision and food waste at a service level. There is an urgent need to ensure that food provision at a service level complies with current dietary guidelines and is accurately assessed. Following a standard method of data collection will allow a more accurate comparison between studies and allow change to be monitored more accurately over time to guide decision makers.

trial registrationAs this research project is conducted at a service level and not a clinical trial, registration was not required.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleFood ServicesHumansMaleNutrition PolicyRefuse DisposalWestern AustraliaChildcareFood provisionLong daycareMeasurementNutritionStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID31311569
PMCPMC6636161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.